Anonymous ID: b157d1 June 28, 2022, 11:27 p.m. No.16552628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2642 >>2647

>>16552615

Jim doesn't charge rent. He even lets the bums get out of the rain.

THE ROOF HAS HOLES. NOT ROTATING SALTS IS HOW RATS AND OWLS AND THE RAIN GETS IN. THEY MIGHT AS WELL BE OUTSIDE, DOOFUSTHE ONLY TIME HE DID IT WAS ON FUCKING ACCIDENT. IT'S A REGULAR MAINTENANCE TASK!

HE SUCKS AT SECURITY AND IS COMPROMISED BY STUPIDITY, AND THAT'S ONLY IF HE'S HONEST. IF NOT THEN THIS WAS INTENTIONAL

Anonymous ID: b157d1 June 29, 2022, 12:16 a.m. No.16552834   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Wowee I'm watching the consensus flip from no-verify to ultra-verify. It must be refusal of cognitive dissonance. All that was necessary was ON THE FIRST TRY (Real Q?) outperformed the larpers who are pissed off that anyone would suggest verifying at all, and the jim splained it to me deerrrrpp crew, who have no idea why people rotate salts at all, just like Jim doesn't know.

Anonymous ID: b157d1 June 29, 2022, 12:24 a.m. No.16552862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16552853

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Why don't you zero delta re-verify, Q?

Anonymous ID: b157d1 June 29, 2022, 12:26 a.m. No.16552874   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2880

>>16552799

Is this a Q post? Woohoo! I got Q'd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JIM WATKINS YOU ARE SO OBVIOUS! HAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Anonymous ID: b157d1 June 29, 2022, 12:55 a.m. No.16553092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3103

>>16553059

I HAVE AT LEAST A ZERO DELTA BUT NOT FULLY, WAY BETTER THAN YOUR WATKINS FAKE Q

BUT I DON'T NEED TO PROVE A Q TO PROVE YOUR FAKE WATKINS Q IS FAKE. HE ALREADY REVEALED HIMSELF TO BE EMOTIONALLY TRIGGERED BY ANTI-WATKINS TRUTH.