I got fake Q'd by a Watkins, emotionally triggered
HI, ADMIRE MY FAKE Q!!!
GETTING Q'D BY WATKINS WAS A GLORIOUS THING TO HAPPEN.
ADDENDUM
I GOT A QUESTION FOR EVERYONE, SAY YOU WERE Q, AND I WAS WRONG, DON'T'CHA THINK REAL Q WOULD HAVE SAID BE QUIET OR EXPRESSED DISFAVOR? (ASSUMING THEY EVEN GOT INTO AN INTERNET FIGHT TOPKEK), BUT NO, INSTEAD I'VE BEEN ABLE TO WEAR MY FAKE Q WITH PRIDE BECAUSE THEY KNOW I CAUGHT THEM MAKING A HUGE MISTAKE.
Interesting ain't it.
OH NOW YOU'RE READY TO VERIFY WITH ZERO DELTA? OH WELL DONE, FINALLY
Maybe so
Notable
He sais no comms outside this platform not thisboard. How dare you dictate.
"Unfalsifiable" Baruch used the same argumentation to assert Ron was Q, ignoring qproofs in the interim. Are you to make the same logical error?
Stifling is the opposite of what you want to do. Rather you need to remove all blockers and let emotional side be as it's a part of you. Healthy things let emotions out. Unhealthy things block them in until your emotional side rebels and lets it out explosively or subtly but either way it will come out
This.
For me it's avoiding ampathic people that I care about, I'll get upset that they're upset, and they'll get more upset and etc. etc. I dunno how to handle that sort of thing other than a thought-stopping activity.
empathic*