o7 anon
you got your wish
they banned me
>No Trip code?
your not allowed to post the link to the tripcoded drop, admin will ban you for it
>you're back anyway
banned means banned, right?
kek
>are you going to refute any of the points i've made?
I searched your UID in this bread
di you make a list of claims in a previous bread?
can you link them?
>thank you anon, you a real one
okay anon
found your bun
taking them one post at a time
>>16552769 (PB) (You)
reconcile these things:
>"Q" said "proof coming" and "Watch POTUS" after there was already a zero delta.. (almost 4 minutes later) .. which means this "Q" didn't realize it had already happened..
correct
anons create the proofs, not Q
the proof is "coming" becuase anons have not noticed and created it yet
instructed to "Watch POTUS" because that is who the DELTA was with (I.E. not Dan, for example)
>Q has never posted a (you) screenshot before
that is possibly true
I certainly dont have any CAP's saved where Q did do that, but there are a lot of Q drops to scrape through to prove one way or the other
>Q has never posted any image with a screenshot timestamp in the filename
same answer as above
although that would be much easier to search for
if you are correct, I absolutely agree that is anomolous
>Q has never acknowledged any other board besides this one
FLAT WRONG
Q started on 4/pol/ and absolutely acknowledged
then migrated to 8chan /cbts/
then migrated to 8chan /greatawakening/
then migrated to 8chan /qresearch/
then created his own private board /patriotsfight/
8chan gets nuked
then migrated to 8kun /qresearch/
then DELETED his own private board /patriotsfight/
then created his own private board /projectdcomms/
and nowpossiblyhas migrated to /hivemind/
that is not exactly unprecedented anon
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552769 (PB) (You)
<if any future posts are required
>what does that mean? will there be future posts or no?
good question anon
I do not have a good answer
<we will re-confirm
>reconfirm what? what was even confirmed? and why would you do it here?
reconfirm identity through ZERO DELTA with POTUS becuase the TRIP is completely comp'd now and can not be trusted
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552803 (PB) (You)
>one last point. wasn't the point of the delta to confirm thatQ and POTUS were in the same room?
>where is President Trump right now? is he in the central time zone?
I answered that one in that bread
>>16552811 (PB) (Me)
>you can set your browser to any timezone you want to anon
>just because that is the timezone displayed on the screenshot
>doesnt mean that is the timezone of the physical location
>but knowing Q
>it could be his actualy physical location timezone
>and it could be part of the proof
>I am -literally- retarded over here
>working through it just like you
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552831 (PB) (You)
>it's true that all of this is unprecedented. i'm just confused by what the purpose of it was, if it's real. they never even stated that the other posts over the weekend were fake and gay or gave us any future direction.. the real Q returning is a gigantic deal and i don't think they would do it this way..
I am also highly suspicious of ALL of it
>a post about the upcoming supreme court decision (similar to fake Q's one-off post about Jane Roe)
similar, but fake Q posted AFTER the RvW opinion was released, "this" Q is posting BEFORE the WV v EPA opinion has been released
>a post containing stringers that could've easily been copypasta'ed from existing Q posts because they weren't unique
the string contains text that is included in previous stringers, but no previous stringer is an EXACT MATCH for this one
i.e. this is a unique stringer that has not yet been used before
your point still stands
it would be really easy to "fake it" by jumbling some copy-pasta
>a post thanking a subset of anons but, not all anons, for their efforts after an 18 month hiatus…
you do kind of have a point here
the post says thank you "BO and Team" …and I happen to be one of the anons that is (You)d by that post
and I am not any part of the /hivemind/ admin team, I dont even bake there
just lowest ranking anon over here
>that's what the real Q wants to broadcast to the entire world after their return?
I am also mystified at the subject matter that "Q" has chosen to make a re-entrance after 1.5 year absence and EVERYTHING that has fucking happened
>OR did babyfist and Jim decide that the larp is over and are trying to quietly shut this down because they've been caught?
ABSOLUTEpossibility
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552843 (PB) (You)
>no, that's not really implied at all. being locked out is not the same as being impersonated…
absolutely correct
>if anyone used Q's tripcode and Q returned, why wouldn't they explicitly state that the prior posts were fake?
it is referenced (tripcode no longer secure) but I agree, I would have liked it to be like 10x more explicitly stated
>do you see how the vagueness is in line with the other fake Q's vagueness?
I do
and I dont like it
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552879 (PB) (You)
>>16552848 (PB) (Me)
>this is the simplest explanation to me. their cover up didn't have the intended effect and now they're back to larp some more.
this is an interesting angle
and other than what I have already posted regarding proofs
I have no way to refute it
>>>16552853 (PB) (some anon, kek)
>"can emotions be used to insert a plant"?
>what does that even mean? that makes no logical sense.
agreed
ready like garbled nonsense
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552888 (PB) (You)
>not to mention
>"worth remembering" doesn't even make sense in that context! that quote is from a recent article. it's not something anons would have magically known and need to "remember" all of a sudden.
Q has done this before
link to a weeks old article with the text: "Worth remembering"
>thank you anon, you a real one
>>16552933 (PB) (You)
>the real Q would have known that the fake Q would keep posting. would they prioritize mitigating this, knowing the impact it could have worldwide
I believe they would prioritize mitigating this fuckery
and I would have liked a more explicit mitigation of it than what we got