updating my logic-based bun on why the /hivemind/ Q is probably fake and gay
>>16553505 pb
another data point: Q always referenced votes with a dash not a slash
https://qalerts.pub/?q=53-47
prove me wrong.
kek, i don't like to speak in absolutes. crazy times, no one knows anything but yea i'm 98.5% sure i'd say
not a mod. refute any of my points, i'm actually all ears and would love to be proven wrong. that anon's screencap makes no sense. they don't seem to understand that a delta happens with POTUS posts, not between Q posts. i agree it shouldn't be notable but the absolute state of this place leaves me unsurprised.
>>16557432
yes, i've seen this graphic of yours all night. i understand it better than you do. i'm the one who told you to order it chronologically top to bottom when i was trolling/larping as Q, kek. you still fail to address any of the points i made in that bun. when you do, with logic, i may come around and admit that this new second Q is real, despite all of the incongruities. until then, you do you, anon.
that was never my wish, fren. and besides, you're back anyway, you're a tough cookie. are you going to refute any of the points i've made?
here you go, it's a bun from last night/this morning. been trying to get more eyes on - i'm genuinely curious what you think
>FLAT WRONG
anon, i clearly was talking about AFTER choosing /qresearch/.
i meant side boards like /qrb/, /midnightriders/, /deepdigs/ etc. obviously private boards wouldn't count in that, kek.
>anons create the proofs, not Q
no, anons create the GRAPHICS of the proofs.. the proof itself is provided by Q. i think you're misunderstanding..
what about the copy-pasted strings?
what about the copy-pasted quote from the Fox News article from the same day, without posting the link, saying "worth remembering"? a phrase that's normally used when referencing a previous drop, not brand new information from the same morning..
what about the 5/4 vote formatting, when Q has always used a dash (like 53-47).. and in fact, all news articles and legitimate sources use the dash when referencing votes, not the slash
anything to say about any of that?
>>16557868
i get it dude, believe me. it's ONE data point out of MANY data points. the entire site is comp'd not just QR. you have to see that, right? it's what we've been proving for almost two weeks now..
>>16557894
>fun
yea it is, as soon as the other anon in here responds to my other points, i'm going back to trolling as Q. going to try to get a zero delta with Trump - which has happened to me probably over a dozen times the past few years, so shouldn't be that hard if he's on a shitposting streak. it's all fake, imo. might as well have fun with it now.
Q