>>16557403
Can you explain why the ID on these posts in the screenshot say (you)?
Nice try.
>>16557403
(you) in screenshots kek.
Sloppy.
>>16557464
He must have noticed.
I've gotten so good I called this new fake Q out.
You probably thought Austin Steinbart was Q too.
>>16557650
They say (you) in the pics idiot.
>>16557689
Oh right so "Q" sent you these screenshots?
Retard.
It's not a proof, it's a trip confirm.
What part of that exchange proves that it is Q?
On a board outside of this? So literally nobody see it? Give me a break.
Yeah nobody has ever debated that Q is a psychological operation genius.