Putin speaks about Ukraine during first foreign trip since February

The Russian president shared his thoughts on the latest NATO summit and Moscow’s goals

Russia’s objectives in Ukraine have not changed, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday during a press conference in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.

“Nothing has changed,” Putin confirmed, saying that the final goal is “to liberate Donbass, to protect these people and to create conditions that would guarantee the safety of Russia itself. That’s it.”

The president clarified that while the goals stay the same, the tactics used to achieve them may change according to what the military considers appropriate. However, he insisted that “everything is going according to plan.”

“I'm not talking about deadlines, I never do, because that’s life, this is reality. Imposing deadlines is wrong, because it is related to the intensity of fighting, and the intensity is directly linked to the possible casualties. And we have to first and foremost think about preserving the lives of our guys,” he said.

Commenting on NATO Secretary-General’s confession that the bloc was getting ready for a conflict since 2014, Putin said that it was “nothing new” for Moscow. He added that for a long time, the US has been looking for an external enemy in order to rally the allies around Washington, and Russia was a better fit for that role than Iran.

This once again confirms what we have been saying all along: that NATO is a Cold War relic. We were always told that NATO has changed, that it is a political bloc now, but everyone was looking for a chance and a justification to give it a new momentum as a specifically military organisation. And there you go, they do it.

Responding to questions about Finland and Sweden joining the bloc, Putin said that West’s portrayal of this as the defeat of Russia’s purpose of keeping NATO away is completely false.

“We don’t have the kind of problems with Sweden and Finland that we unfortunately do with Ukraine,” he said. “We have no territorial disputes, we have nothing that would worry us with regards to Finland’s and Sweden’s NATO memberships. If they want to, let them.”

“They have to clearly understand that they didn’t have any threats before, but now, if military forces and infrastructure are located there, we will be forced to respond tit-for-tat, and create the same threats for the territories we are threatened from,” Putin warned. “This is obvious. Do they not understand it? Everything was fine before between us, but now there will be tension, of course, I repeat, if we are threatened.”

However, Putin underlined that at this time, Moscow does not view the potential threats from Stockholm and Helsinki as dangerous as the ones that have been coming from Kiev over the past years.

https://www.rt.com/russia/558109-putin-ukraine-nato-goals/

EU chief can’t find texts with Pfizer CEO

The European Commission downplayed the importance of the missing messages, which were sent during Covid-19 vaccine negotiations

Commission replies to Ombudsman findings concerning refusal to give access to text messages about COVID-19 vaccines

The Commission has replied to the Ombudsman's findings concerning its refusal to give public access to text messages between its President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company about a COVID-19 vaccine contract. The Ombudsman's initial analysis is that the reply is problematic on several points. The closing decision, to be published within the coming weeks, will include a full analysis.

https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/news-document/en/157773

FDA Panel Advisor Admits Agency “LOST” Clinical Trial Data for Placebo Group Before Approving Experimental Vaccine for Babies and Toddlers

Earlier this month the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the mRNA vaccine for emergency use in young children, aged six months to five years old, after its advisory committee voted in favor of the experimental treatment, claiming that it has passed its clinical hurdles and is effective in preventing symptomatic infection without causing worrisome side effects.

However, in addition to ignoring the mountain of evidence showing the vaccines are regularly causing life-threatening injuries – especially in healthy children and young people, the FDA ‘experts’ have routinely skipped crucial steps in the testing process, allowing them to manipulate the data in order to suit their desired outcomes.

This inexcusable act of criminal malpractice was confirmed this month by the team leader of the FDA’s clinical review staff, Rachel Zhang, who explained during an advisory panel zoom call that the agency had lost the results from the placebo group during its clinical trials related to the decision to approve the experimental jab for America’s youngest children.

Without this data from the placebo group, the effectiveness of the vaccine cannot be measured against those who did not receive the treatment. Therefore, the clinical trial is meaningless. But the gaping hole in the results apparently doesn’t matter to the ‘experts’ at the FDA, who went ahead with the EUA approval anyway.

“There is no efficacy data,” Zhang explained. “I guess it will have to come from real-world effectiveness,” she added glibly.

In other words, babies and toddlers are essentially vaccine guinea pigs that will provide the lost data. Remember, Zheng is the team leader of the FDA’s clinical review staff, which oversees the approval of new medical treatments.

From Zheng:

“…We have lost the placebo groups, so we cannot really say anything about the duration of vaccine efficacy after that.

There’s no more efficacy data, basically, after that time point. So, unfortunately, we are limited to – in this study – would be the results that we have shown you in the slide with the data cut off. The latest one [placebo group data] would be the May 31st one, and that still is, unfortunately, very few cases…

…I guess it will have to come from real-world effectiveness.”

How does something like this even happen? They don’t even have to come up with a viable excuse anymore. This is literally on par with the old ‘dog ate my homework’ line. What a joke.

Considering the horrible results of the vaccine across the board when it comes to the basic job of preventing the spread of the virus, it is awfully convenient that the data which would confirm natural immunity in healthy young children is better than the failed experimental jab just happens to disappear.

Nevertheless, despite the myriad of issues, the FDA dutifully approved the vaccine for babies and toddlers just days after Zheng admitted the agency had “no efficacy data.” Because sCiEnCe!

Keep in mind that children have an astonishing 99.995% recovery rate from the virus. The vaccine itself is more than likely worse than the virus itself, as some estimates have pegged the number of children who have died from Covid, as opposed to with it, at zero.

Not only are children effectively in zero danger of this virus, but recent data has shown that they are actually more susceptible to long-term vaccine injury after taking the experimental mRNA jab, especially among young boys. Cases of myocarditis have exploded among young Americans, hitting unprecedented levels ever since the vaccine was made available to those aged 12-17.

With all of the data out there, NOT vaccinating children aged 5 months to 6 years should be a no-brainer. Putting this poison into the arm of an innocent toddler is beyond criminal.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/fda-panel-advisor-admits-agency-lost-clinical-trial-data-placebo-group-approving-experimental-vaccine-babies-toddlers-video/

Australian bank Volt collapses urging 6000 customers to withdraw funds

The company went under as it couldn’t raise the $200 million it needed to continue operating and has urged customers to pull out their money

An Australian bank that collapsed has urged its 6000 customers to withdraw $100 million worth of deposits before it starts closing accounts from next Tuesday.

Volt, a digital bank called a neobank which was launched in 2017, announced it was handing back its banking licence to the regulator on Wednesday.

It was the first start up to gain the banking licence in January 2019 after the government sought to increase competition in the sector.

The bank’s demise means 140 staff have lost their jobs after the board made the decision to close the business. It said it failed to raise enough funds to support its plans to write mortgages.

Luke Bunbury and Steve Weston were the co-founders of Volt Bank. Picture: Hollie Adams/The Australian

https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/banking/australian-bank-volt-collapses-urging-6000-customers-to-withdraw-funds/news-story/2cbdca763f8d4088d8808bdfef7d9bf9

Former Sheriff: Deaths Keep Happening on Border

NTD spoke with Richard Mack, a former county sheriff from Arizona, to assess the ongoing border crisis.

https://www.youmaker.com/v/lDGRBJyyZPGW

https://www.ntd.com/former-sheriff-deaths-keep-happening-on-border_801524.html

Dangerous and Ineffective: Experimental Pfizer Vaccine Causes Nearly FIVE “SERIOUS Adverse Events” Per Every ONE Person it Kept From Being Hospitalized with Covid, Study Finds

It has become increasingly clear that the experimental mRNA vaccines are nothing close to ‘safe’ or ‘effective’ as they have been billed to be. For months, data has been emerging that not only shows the vaccines do little in the way of stopping transmission (or are likely spreading the virus) and are causing an untold amount of serious medical complications such as myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, blood clots, immune system failure, and Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, known as the SADS for short (yes, really), among others.

Yet, somehow, the medical ‘experts’ and the tyrannical Biden regime continue advocating that Americans take the toxic jab, promising its safety and effectiveness as if the vaccine had caused no issues whatsoever. And that’s as the US Government’s own Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), which is notoriously underreported, is showing nearly 30,000 deaths and over 50,000 permanent disabilities related to the vaccine – by far the most of any in history.

So, naturally, Fauci and the ‘experts’ just green-lighted the jab for babies and toddlers.

While it may be obvious to those paying attention that the experimental mRNA treatments have caused profound damage to the health of people across the globe, the extent of the problem is still vague even if we know its widespread. However, thanks to a new research study that was published this week by the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), we are finally starting to see the bigger picture, and the ‘safe and effective’ narrative should finally be able to be destroyed once and for all.

According to the study, mRNA vaccines from both Moderna and Pfizer were more likely to cause a “severe” adverse reaction (vaccine injury like myocarditis, etc.) than prevent covid hospitalizations. And not just a little more either. Moderna’s vaccine was found to cause “15.1 serious adverse events” for every 6.4 people kept out of the hospital.

Pfizer’s mRNA jab was even worse. Clocking in at an astonishing 10.1 serious adverse events per every 2.3 prevented hospitalizations – which is nearly 5 to 1.

Keep in mind that Covid-19 is only moderately more dangerous than the flu in the first place. The serious medical complications linked to the vaccine are much more life-threatening than the virus itself. And yet, Pfizer’s vaccine is 5x more likely to cause a serious adverse event than prevent a serious case of Covid-19, per the study.

From the SSRN study, titled “Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials:”

“Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinatedover placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively.

Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9).

The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).”

In conclusion, the researchers call for a formal, widespread harm-benefit analysis to be conducted – something that should have been done throughout the clinical trials before the widespread rollout to the public. As they have found with minimal research, “serious AE’s outweigh reduction in serious risks mitigated,” so there is no excuse for the ‘experts’ to have missed such an obvious safety signal.

The study concludes:

“The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for 49 formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious 50 COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.”

Talk about killing two birds with one stone. The data is clear: this vaccine is dangerous and ineffective.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239