>>16570182 (pb)

> I'm not the person you asked, but I'd say you're an idiot if you think the vax is hurting people.

Life insurance companies are saying that all-cause deaths are up among the working age people, so much so that they're panicking a bit. I'd say that's people getting harmed.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana/indiana-life-insurance-ceo-says-deaths-are-up-40-among-people-ages-18-64/article_71473b12-6b1e-11ec-8641-5b2c06725e2c.html

And whoever approved the jabs for babies should be arrested. They had to ignore a hell of a lot to do that.

>>16570392

The spiritual implications of Roe v. Wade makes that ruling the more impactful.

But the EPA ruling has the capability of changing just about everything about how we're being governed. I'm especially interested to see how that one affects the FDA and CDC.

And, if those agencies can't make regulations on their own, what are the odds that we're going to let the WHO do it?

>>16570449

Whether or not they are a government agency, they've been given a .gov, and they're acting like it. And if the EPA can't make regulations on their own, the the CDC sure the hell shouldn't be! And yet….