BUT..
that would be racist?
so just "first",
BUT that would be incorrect.
So she just there & no one knows why.
OK.
What do you see?
Questions…
Why is pompass in UK? - expecting to take ja back?
he would know appeals are pending……so MAYBE
Paying off pritti? - suitcase cash? MAYBE
But look at pic.
What does BL say?
"Standing together" ?
or a long way apart?
No handshake for camera?
"UK 'distancing itself from c_ia"?
or MAYBE, I am just looking for something not there, wishful thinking perhaps?
https://twitter.com/StellaMoris1/status/1542578480734420993?cxt=HHwWgoCy5ZG9q-gqAAAA
I still don't quite get why moon don't spin.
U mean like
"make them walk up the hill, they will be dying to climb, and watch them self-crux"
Sounds great to me, wish I'd thought of it.
wait I didn't , some else did.
Hope so. :-)
Thanks, but after a big bang, to come to a stop?
Does that mean earth will also, in time? due to same forces?
Maybe the "other side" (which does get light) is concave?
"A widely spread misapprehension is that a tidally locked body permanently turns one side to its host (e.g. in Neron de Surgy & Laskar 1997; Joshi et al. 1997; Grießmeier et al. 2004; Khodachenko et al. 2007). Various other studies only include the impact of eccentricity on tidal locking, neglecting the contribution from obliquity (Goldreich& Soter 1966; Goldreich 1966; Eggleton et al. 1998; Trilling 2000; Showman & Guillot 2002; Dobbs-Dixon et al. 2004; Selsis et al. 2007; Barnes et al. 2008). As long as ‘tidal locking’ denotes only the state of dωp/dt = 0, the actual equilibrium rotation period, as predicted by the CTL model of Lec10, may differ from the orbital period, namely when e ≠ 0 and/or ψp ≠ 0. Only if ‘tidal locking’ depicts the recession of tidal processes in general, when e = 0 and ψp = 0 in Lec10’s model, then ωp = n. As given by Eq. (23), one side of the planet is permanently orientated towards the star if both e = 0 and ψ = 0 [2]. In this case, habitability of a planet can potentially be ruled out when the planet’s atmosphere freezes out on the dark side and/or evaporates on the bright side (Joshi et al. 1997). As long as e and ψp are not eroded, however, the planet can be prevented from an ωp = n locking. In the CPL model, however, the equilibrium rotation state is not a function of ψp, thus ‘tidal locking’, denoting dωp/dt = 0, indeed can occur for ψp ≠ 0."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ATidal_locking
Cheaper than pumping?
Helping out a mate?
Equip failures?
if SA turn on, then OPEC increases production, price goes down (aka wrong way for them)
better to buy ruskie output, store it, make $ go up, but ruskie don't win.
dunno really, just spit balln
Did you ever wonder why they dig / drill / mine so deep for "fossil fuels" ???
Shit load of dirt got piled on the dinos!
Wonder who did the burying?
The earth (as a ball in space) spins + rotates.
our "day" (aka 24hrs) compares to 27.32 for moon.
our "year" compares to ….
see my prob?
The whole shitshow was spat out into space at some massive velocity.
So our whole solar system is hurting through space (ever expanding???)
some how all of those forces cause the moon not to "spin" as it orbit.
Again is far away side concave?
U prob know, I just not sure.
funny that chyna paid a visit not long ago…
not 1 f'n pic (I was looking) of "far side".
ummm