>>>16572890
>
>Freddy …. has a video up explaining the tripcode malarkey,
>The Valor Collection celebrates four branches of the U.S. Armed Forces – the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps. Designed in collaboration with decorated war veteran and U.S. Navy SEAL Master…
>
>those eyes
where are Space Force Collectibles
Biden didn't revoke Trump's Sept 2018 EO that orders punishments for those who undermine trust and faith in the US Democratic institutions by casting doubts on the integrity and honesty of the elections … why is that … anons thought that was a great EO
Cool AF…
"many have wondered if there's intelligent life out there in the vastness of Outer Space … and if there is, do they got ray guns?"
Woody Allen (quoted from memory)
it's called the species problem in the philosophy of biology
The species problem is the set of questions that arises when biologists attempt to define what a species is. Such a definition is called a species concept; there are at least 26 recognized species concepts.[1] A species concept that works well for sexually reproducing organisms such as birds may be useless for species that reproduce asexually, such as bacteria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_concept
>>>16572672
>
>Notable
>
>Q really thought of everything. It's like they knew site admins weren't trustworthy.
O sancta simplicitas …
(Phys.org) —These days, getting a Ph.D. is probably the last thing you want to do if you are out to revolutionize the world. If, however, what you propose is an idea, rather than a technology, it can still be a valuable asset to have. Dr. Eugene McCarthy is a Ph.D. geneticist who has made a career out of studying hybridization in animals. He now curates a biological information website called Macroevolution.net where he has amassed an impressive body of evidence suggesting that human origins can be best explained by hybridization between pigs and chimpanzees. Extraordinary theories require extraordinary evidence and McCarthy does not disappoint. Rather than relying on genetic sequence comparisons, he instead offers extensive anatomical comparisons, each of which may be individually assailable, but startling when taken together. Why weren't these conclusions arrived at much sooner? McCarthy suggests it is because of an over-dependence on genetic data among biologists. He argues that humans are probably the result of multiple generations of backcrossing to chimpanzees, which in nucleotide sequence data comparisons would effectively mask any contribution from pig.
http://www.macroevolution.net/index.html#.UdRBiJz5T1U
>>>16573174
>
>Ligars can't repo, afaik
Generally speaking, interspecies hybrids—like mules, ligers (lion-tiger hybrids), or zedonks (zebra-donkey hybrids)—are less fertile than the parents that produced them. However, as McCarthy has documented in his years of research into hybrids, many crosses produce hybrids that can produce offspring themselves. The mule, he notes, is an exceptionally sterile hybrid and not representative of hybrids as a whole. When it comes time to play the old nuclear musical chairs and produce gametes, some types of hybrids do a much better job. Liger females, for example, can produce offspring in backcrosses with both lions and tigers. McCarthy also points out that fertility can be increased through successive backcrossing with one of the parents, a common technique used by breeders. In the case of chimp - pig hybridization, the "direction of the cross" would likely have been a male boar or pig (Sus scrofa) with a female chimp (Pan troglodytes), and the offspring would have been nurtured by a chimp mother among chimpanzees (shades of Tarzan!). The physical evidence for this is convincing, as you can discover for yourself with a trip over to macroevolution.net.
https://phys.org/news/2013-07-chimp-pig-hybrid-humans.html
get in faggot … we are going to crash the party
define life
>>>16573348 (You)
>
>Interesting, Thx.
>
>I always wondered where the 1/2 & 1/2 er's were?
>
>If 2 species combine, then while the originals may or may not exist (died out)
>
>would there not be a trace of the cross breeding?
>
>eg 1/2 human 1/2 chimp?
the non Sub African populations have Neanderthal admixture … the sub Saharan African s might have traces of different archaic hominids