>>1657263

Anons

If we accept that Q is predicting - to the day - something that will happen in advance, and we are accepting the Qlock, 111 days etc....

Then the only explanation that I can justify is the John Titor explanation.

You cannot otherwise predict a response by the day that far ahead.

Am I going crazy? (probably)

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/551048/John-Titor-Donald-Trump-time-traveller-mystery-warn-ISIS-nuclear-war-Nikola-Tesla-election

>>1657864

Looks like Q:

-No disinformation involved.

-Not asking for anything in return.

-Looks like explanation of recent darkness.

-Theme is freedom and truth (always is)

>>1658081

Thanks Anon. Thought it was new. Thought I remembered every one of the 1440 but I now realise my IQ must have dropped by at least 10 points.

If it drops any lower I might have to go look for a job at CNN.

/scolds himself for stupidity/….