they never even mention that they accept donations, the stream isnt monetized, there is no premium content, so what are you complaining about? be specific…
>regular monthly payments
fake news, those pictures are very old, they considered doing those things but never followed through on it due to this sort of hate that showed up for it,.
and by mention i meant in the stream they dont mention it in the stream, so if your just listening to them like the average youtuber you never know they take donations,
there is at this time no zero premium content and never has been, those screenshots show they intended at one point to try it months ago, but like i said never followed through with it.
they do not link qresearch.
and we cant discuss qresearch? thats bullshit, you literally cannot fully redpill people into this without mentioning it.
Q was talking about premium content, and as Q put it he was just calling out those who would react to it, like corsi did, the soapbox had no issues and no reactions cause they knew from the start they arent the target,
because - no premium content.
>Why aren't they researching
and they do research, they read whatever news links they can find, the use discord to organize any relevant news links their memebers can find and contribute, much like the anons function here, aggregating data from the web.,
they like us are all just trying to get to the truth and spread the truth.
this is an attack on a messenger, not on a messege, that is ad hominum,
if you distrust the soapbox. why? what is wrong with their message?
they trust Q, they trust the plan, they trust sessions. all they are doing is redpilling utube normies.
is that bad?
you just hate them cause they accept donations? thats pretty lame for reasoning to hate the effort to redpill utube normies……
>they list and link to /qresearch/ notables
looking, not seeing it, i do not see any links to qresearch or notables,
even if they did thats no different from qanon.pub which is shared widely…
>Patreon link
all their patreon teirs give NO PREMIUM CONTENT how many times i gotta say that before you get it, its just another way to donate,
if your gonna keep alleging premium content, show me where it says there is premium content. go on, ill wait…
>monetizing the work
they are not monetized, no ads.
they merely accept donations, that is not the same as monetizing…
totaly agree, and you are right, ill drop it, ive said enough,
ok last post i swear.
so that is buried away in their forums, and right below it is this
>Posting Etiquette Tutorials
>1) Don't Post to ask questions. This is a "work/collaboration" area. Be well versed in all of the Q posts and come in there with all intentions of CONTRIBUTING to the collaboration.
>2) Don't Post unless you have good "sauce" or vetted theories. Anons can smell a Nuub from miles away. If you insist on posting,
>be prepared to have your ideas challenged or even ridiculed.
>3) Anons hate today's Politically Correct culture and have their own slang as they work. Whatever you do,
>Don't post a "commentary" on how you are offended by their "culture". I've seen this happen in real time, it was one of the most brutal displays of $h1TP0sting backlash I've ever seen.
>4) LURK
>5) LURK
>6) LURK MOAR!
>7) LURK MOAR FAG!
so even though they link to the catalog not the notables not a thread, but to the catalog…. they still follow it with etiquette.
>pub don't advertise
neither do they, no ad's, no monetization,
and qanon.pub does indeed accept donations you can see that right here https://keybase.io/qntmpkts
>they solicit monthly donations
a monthly donation, is not a monthly subscription, a subscription comes with premium content, they have no premium content, therein lies the difference.
>only then to retreat and go mainstream
not something they have done in anyway, get back to me when they do that…
>they ask for monthly payments to remain Patriots
no they dont, they accept donations, that is it, everyone gets the same treatment and the same content whether they donate or not.
>seek personal gain
there is no personal gain, all their donations go straight back to the stream, whether its equipment or hosting costs. that does not qualify as profit, nor personal gain.
>You decide
>soapbox garbage filling up half the thread
im sorry,
its hard for me to sit by quietly when im seeing lies and misinformation/disinformation, again you decide…
>Please post a cap of where on qanon.pub's page you've linked to where donations are solicited
images added
>Q has posted about PAYTRIOTS
Paytriots as Q said is about subscriptions and premium content, Q never said we are not allowed to accept donations… show me where he said we cant accept donations…
that was the twitter account backchannel17,
there is a separate thread for discussing bch17
likewise in order to find the soapbox webpage at all you have to look for it,
all their traffic is on their youtube stream, the only people on their website find it in the description box of their utube stream, probly where you got it too.
and arent we just splitting hairs now?
if this is gonna continue lets make a thread of it, so we stop sliding this bread
>profiting
only in the same way as qanon.pub
personally, i think our numbers on the chans are fewer then we all think,
pay close attention to the uid number, we are trying to wake the world, WW, 7 billion people.
is it so bad we bring more in? theres what 91 uids right now? 91 people gonna redpill the world huh….. how many of those are shills?
we think of ourselves as an army,
when its more like a small militia.
editing a quote to make it look like i said something i didnt is a huge no no round here….
you'd know that if you werent the shill….
>What do you think this RESEARCH thread would look like with 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 people trying to use it and post chit chat??
>
>It would be completely useless at that point.
would never happen,. the open hostility from shills etc drives people away.
even if it did happen BO would crack down on shitposting, imagine how many calm rational researchers we'd gain from such.
also, imagine how the media and tptb would be shittin themselves if they saw that happening….
its not mine, im not pam, i have spoken on the stream before though, ill admit that.
theres no content to reply to in your post, again your just back on insinuations against character and not message.
youll know when pam posts cause he gets all mad an curses, ive seen it.
kek
>BO does NOT censor here
you are wrong and you need to lurk more.
it is literally right on top of the notables titled GLOBAL
as you would know had you been lurking since then and prior, BO and BV did go through quite a ban fest trying to keep the shills at bay the past 6 months,
there were periods they would unban all and not ban at all really, then due to influx of shills they would return to banning shills (the obvious ones)
then when the shills would complaign as anons about being censored they would reverse the bans.
all this is history a lurker would know, so lurk moar
which book would you recommend as comparison? like the oldest original version?
>The baffled king composing Hallelujah
>>1658164 and the water thing too.