>#2086: The Soap (box) Opera Edition
Thank you Baker.
Bless this morning Bread.
>>1658192 (all last bread)
>>1658176
>ROT13. Q did make a post about ROTATION.
>>1658207
>moving down the line 13 spaces
And just so "coincidentally"
>>1657638
<<< crappy cipher.png
=13
by jove, y'all may have it anons.
most excellent sleuthing.
>>1658207 (lb)
And look at that, also under ROT-13,
B=O
>https://infogalactic.com/info/ROT13
ROT13 is used in online forums as a means of hiding spoilers, punchlines, puzzle solutions, and offensive materials from the casual glance. ROT13 has been described as the "Usenet equivalent of a magazine printing the answer to a quiz upside down."[2]
ROT13 has inspired a variety of letter and word games on-line, and is frequently mentioned in newsgroup conversations.
does anyone have that deleted tweet by Flynn?
thought i saved, appears i didn't…thx in advance…
speaking of pizza & pain, from last bread
>>1658005
>>1658169
>>1658187
>>1658224
>>http://www.cultofweird.com/occult/hand-of-the-mysteries/
>>1658267
yes, like cooking or kneading bread for instance.
>>1658240 (repost pic)
that's an interesting one, anon, given that Podesta's so deep into Bluebeam.
any thoughts on the bees?
See that too. Looks like the left has been making this 13th amendment argument for a while now.
No surprise if they might be bringing out of the woodwork again.
This guy seems to applying a "common sense" approach.
How fun would it be to have this cat as a senator from FL?
>http://www.janowskiforsenate2018.com/issues/immigration-amnesty-and-refugees/
speaking of owls, some sauce on the Shroud of Turin.
(Turin is where the 66th Bilderberg gathering has begun today)
>https://nypost.com/2011/04/24/resurrecting-the-mystery-of-the-shroud-of-turin/
Like it has so many times in its long, tortured history, the Shroud of Turin is again, this Easter 2011, resurrected. I don’t use resurrected lightly. If authentic, the ancient linen cloth with mysterious images of a crucified and tortured corpse on its fibers is tangible proof to many Christians of Jesus’ rise from the dead. And while authenticity is certainly still in debate, the burden of proof now — at least on the Shroud’s inexplicableness — has shifted to the doubters.
But it wasn’t until 1898, and the first photographs of the linen were taken, that real controversy began. Details not clear on the cloth’s images were, in the negative plate, vivid and real. The face, which had looked wide-eyed and owl-like, was serene with eyes closed. It was realized that what was on the cloth’s surface was itself like a photographic negative — lights and darks were reversed.
Historians, including those in the Church — often embarrassed by phony relics — argued it was a painted fake.