>>16582752 (pb)
>forgetting entirety of Q's history with the exception of when tor was required
You need to read your qposts, ignoramus, you sound as clueless as I do, but at least I admit it
>>16582752 (pb)
>forgetting entirety of Q's history with the exception of when tor was required
You need to read your qposts, ignoramus, you sound as clueless as I do, but at least I admit it
Q never needed tor, why now? You know TOR is owned by the FBI, right?
Remember who is on Q's side in this, observers.
Imagine >>16582877
Never knowing Satan corrupted from the top down. Got sauce for those claims? How about honesty for once, like not censoring, and verifying Q according to Q's own wishes and charter rules?
Hypocrites.
AND HERE I MOCK MAN WHO FOLLOW MAMMON, AND THE CLUELESS WHO FOLLOW HIM AS WELL
AND YOU THINK I MOCK GOD, WHEN I SERVE DIVINE JUSTICE
YOU MAKE CLAIMS OF MY ATTITUDE TOWARDS GOD WHEN I HAVE ONLY ADDRESSED ADMINISTRATOR
ARE YOU SURE YOU'RE NOT CONFLATING THE TWO ERRONEOUSLY?
Never act against any evils you see? You have been undone by ideology, or could it be that you will preach to me about never acting and will of course act as you please yourself, with full knowledge of humanity's free will?
Think about what it means to make a choice and choose to serve divine justice instead of evil
YOU ARE USING LANGUAGE TO MAKE CLAIMS I HAVE NOT MADE. A TACTIC USED BY SATANISTS. I WONDER WHY YOU SLIDE IN ONE TERM FOR ANOTHER?
Why'd he set up a zero-delta procedure? Hint: because he DOES NOT TRUST JIM AND ANYONE ELSE TO NOT GET COMPROMISED.
He besmirched Q first, allowing moderator interaction on his private board contrary to Q's wishes. He still has not said it is still not possible to happen.
EXCEPT IT WAS LITERALLY BESMIRCHED WITH A B POST, IDIOT
So you're saying you're an idiot? Is that what you're intending to say really?
Ok so you are an idiot who thinks they know what they are talking about. Got it. Thanks.
Democrats worried more about abortion than who fucked a 10 year old.
STOP WITH YOUR SNUFF FANTASIES. READ WHAT I SAID AGAIN.
You don't recognize your own tactic mirrored 1-by-1 back to you?
CONSEQUENCES FOR CHOICES MADE IS NOT HATE. ASKING WHO FUCKED A 10 YEAR OLD IS A MUCH BETTER ALTERNATIVE THAN USING AS A POLITICAL TOOL.
Dude, I'm just refusing to talk to you, that's all really.
topkek
You're arguing your own points. I don't give a fuck about you, babyfist. Not a single fuck was thrown your way, egotistical moron. I don't even give enough of a fuck about you to give a fuck that I get your name right or not.
Ah right because the onset of puberty is why pedophilia exists.
Maybe for sniffers like Joes who can smell the adrenochrome coming? But nah…
Are you aware of "Pot Doctors" because wehn you set it up in the law to allow only by medical advice, you're going to have "Murder Doctors" in much the same fashion. You are aware of this, correct? You are party to infanticide supporting this. Welcome to reality.