Anonymous ID: 37cfea Jan. 26, 2018, 4:06 a.m. No.166097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS

>PURPOSE AND INTENT

>The purpose and intent of this title are to ensure that all American Citizens have a their constitutional rights protected in all virtual environments, including all networks and regardless of the electronic device used.

>ELIGIBILITY AND EXCEPTIONS

>This bill apply to all American Citizen living within the 50 States, territories and abroad.

>DEFINITIONS

 

Individual users of the Internet (real persons)

Business users of the Internet (companies)

Providers of Internet connectivity

Providers of Internet content

Protectors of rights of the above (government)

 

>RULES AND PROVISIONS

>1) Freedom of Speech

>Here we can add a wording similar to what AT&T (no censorship, no throttling down, no shadowbanning, etc) Free speech protected especially for political ideas.

>2) Right to privacy

>Here we can address all of the SMART devices that are spying on us.

>3) Right to retain personal information

>Here we explain how providers (need definitions) are not allowed to invade our devices, data, etc. doing spying (i.e. microsoft) which should be considered like hacking and fishing, with a penalty of (jail?)

>4) Right to not been followed around the internet

>5) Right to the safety of your own computer

>Noone, no agency, no corp, etc can access our computer without express permission from a judge. The same as your home.

>One thing I would think everyone would agree on is that the expectation of privacy should extend from user device to the recipient of the users communication. Unless a user is explicitly identifying themselves on a public platform (social media, etc) then they have a right to be secure just as they would if they were sending sealed letters through the USPS. Intercept of communication should require that a warrant that names the targeted individual, and subject to better protections and oversight than is currently provided in secret by FISA courts.

>EFFECTIVE DATE