dChan
Anonymous ID: 569b60 Feb. 3, 2018, 10:44 a.m. No.258726   🗄️.is đź”—kun

INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS

 

PURPOSE AND INTENT

 

The purpose and intent of this title are to ensure that all American Citizens have a their constitutional rights protected in all virtual environments, including all networks and regardless of the electronic device used.

 

ELIGIBILITY AND EXCEPTIONS

 

This bill apply to all American Citizen living within the 50 States, territories and abroad.

 

DEFINITIONS

Individual users of the Internet (real persons)

Business users of the Internet (companies)

Providers of Internet connectivity

Providers of Internet content

Protectors of rights of the above (government)

 

RULES AND PROVISIONS

1) Freedom of Speech

Here we can add a wording similar to what AT&T (no censorship, no throttling down, no shadowbanning, etc) Free speech protected especially for political ideas.

 

2) Right to privacy

Here we can address all of the SMART devices that are spying on us.

 

3) Right to retain personal information

Here we explain how providers (need definitions) are not allowed to invade our devices, data, etc. doing spying (i.e. microsoft) which should be considered like hacking and fishing, with a penalty of (jail?)

 

4) Right to not been followed around the internet

What is needed is a right to not be tracked + a right to defend against it.

The right to defend could be very practical - say the right to organize ddos attacks against offending parties….. <WORDING>

that includes Cookies

 

5) Right to the safety of your own computer

 

6) fairness of services

Traffic should be treated anonymously in terms of individual identity of users. Management decisions should be based on type of service and bandwidth requirements necessary for that type, and it should be required to be disclosed how that priority hierarchy algorithm is applied.

 

Noone, no agency, no corp, etc can access our computer without express permission from a judge. The same as your home.

 

One thing I would think everyone would agree on is that the expectation of privacy should extend from user device to the recipient of the users communication. Unless a user is explicitly identifying themselves on a public platform (social media, etc) then they have a right to be secure just as they would if they were sending sealed letters through the USPS. Intercept of communication should require that a warrant that names the targeted individual, and subject to better protections and oversight than is currently provided in secret by FISA courts.