If you look at the current bill of rights and cross them, it works
1 F.O.S Right to assembly right to press
= right to F.O.S right to form competing forums (GAB) Right to independent media
-
Bear Arms, Militia
= right to dissent, arms would have to take a different meaning so the wording doesn't work as well ammendmemnt 1 and 2 would be combined?
Same with 3 and 4 because in the virtual world being surveiled is the same as having someone hangout in your virtual house.
Amendment 5 would grant exceptions for suspension of rights listed in 3 and 4 for internet users and list out the due process that must be met for suspension of user protections listed in 3 and 4
Amendment 6: whatever the equivalent of speedy trial etc. Trouble when considering suspension of protections in 3 and 4? how can surveillance be effective if user know their 'witness' and that they are being surveilled? Would suggest that suspension of protections in 3 and 4 be required to be repeatedly approved by judge. Another problem > need more judges and advocates who are internet literate.
Amendment 7 and 8 can be reworded or combined to meet their virtual equivalent.
Amendment 9 is hugely abused but essentially no 'word-salads' or lies/interpretations used to make up new laws that violate The Internet bill of rights.
Amendment 10: The user and forums and assemblies, virtual institutions shall enjoy autonomy and all rights to self-govern that are not listed as the governments province.
It can be done_X