Anonymous ID: 61ac5b July 3, 2022, 6:56 p.m. No.16592003   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2024

>>16591778

>Unless we're going to say

Nice try, but even when you put an 'unless' in front, that's still introducing what is now a political party of tyranny insinuating/suggesting by rhetorical questioning an ask that the public start discussing amongst themselves whether a branch of the federal government should be effectively abolished.

 

Notice the dialectic inversion of false obligation to think one thing if you don't think the other.

 

JUST REARRANGE THE WORDS TO SEE IT.

 

"We have to heed the word of the Supreme Courtโ€ฆunless we're all going to say the word of the Supreme Court will no longer have value."

 

Meet the Press is in code actively calling for the public to start thinking and saying (BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE) "The word of the Supreme Court no longer has any value".

Anonymous ID: 61ac5b July 3, 2022, 7 p.m. No.16592034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>16592015

>irrelative

And you can't spell either. The word your brainlet mush was struggling to remember from that one time in the room with literate speakers, is 'irrelevant'.

๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜ƒ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜ƒ๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿคขโค๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธโค๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜˜๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ