Question to anons/BV/BO:
How did Q prove to be legit?
Just saw that Q posted again, at least saw that drops with a tripcode were baked as Q drops.
After Q took so much time to prove to be legit, with all the "known habbenings" and POTUS deltas and comms and such, how did Q prove it this time?
How can anons be sure it´s actually Q posting (when this board has proven to be shilly)?
(Actual question, hoping for actual answer.)
have there been recent proofs that were as strong as the ton of drops before Q stopped posting for many months?
bc if there has not been this kind of proof, I doubt that it´s actually Q posting, bc well, anyone would have to doubt it.
I see that no drops have been baked as Q drops and I see that BO/BV gave another tripcode (after this hasd been compromised couple of times in the past).
so how did Q prove it´s actually Q?
deltas with POTUS? knowledge of major habbenings?
bc Q kind of trained anons to make sure stuff is actually legit.
so on a board where the tripcode had been compromised couple of times and when talking about Q drops who had to be proven legit by a ton of things, anons should now just go ahead and trust anyone posting with a tripcode that (very shilly acting) BO/BV gave?
nah. doesn´t seem logical.
but if anons can refer to actual proof, that´s another thing.
I am seeing drops baked as Q drops.
Q had not posted for many months.
I know that Q made sure anons know it´s legit by making a ton of actual proof, like posting in the same second Trump tweeted or letting anons know "future proves past" kind of knowledge.
Also I know that the tripcode has been compromised, I know that BO/BVs went against Q and Q had to make pressure so they did not act too shilly.
Would anons have believed it´s Q posting w/o all the proofs? Would anons have believed it´s Q posting if the "tippy top" things or things like that would not have happened?
Why would anons believe it´s Q only bc BO gave a tripcode?
So asking again, how can anons make sure it´s actually Q posting, when he has not posted in 2 years and when this time there seems to me now prove whatsoever, and when this time I cannot even see "hey, it´s actually me, please BO, give me a tripcode" drops?
Q did not start as "8kun Q", obviously.
and before Q was taken legit, there where a ton of proofs, like the ones I posted on.
yup, that is at least what logic tells and what actual Q said over and over.
bs. yes, obviously bs.