>>16593714

>When it shows an earlier timestamp post after a later timestamp?

exactly

post numbering out of sequence with timestamp chronology

>>16593721

>What if… it is WE who are out of sync?

ohhhhh fuck

my mind just became gravy

>>16593721

>What if… it is WE who are out of sync?

timing is everything

>>16593723

>We're all out of timeliness, pal

I kek'd

>>16593720

did you actually type that anon?

thats some gay shit yo

>>16593740

>Posting no longer gives an error message.

>The logical explanation is they broke something else fixing it

that is actually very logical

>check out alacrity daemon

5:5 anon

>>16593764

>Jim must have hired a programmer.

I

have

my

doubts