Anonymous ID: e10710 June 7, 2018, 10:31 a.m. No.1659991   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0000

>>1659904

>>1659915

>>1659913

 

Nonsense rule; second answer correct. Bot covering-responses obvious.

 

And yet we have this infantile, nonsensical rule in "notables". Because we are relentlessly comped by relentless AI.

 

Has there been any sign of BO?

 

Any attempt to move to a confirmed-human, uncomped, debotted board?

Anonymous ID: e10710 June 7, 2018, 10:38 a.m. No.1660048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0127

>>1660000

Do we have any confirmation that he is safe and not under clown duress (which would explain comped breads) or replaced by clown simulacrum (also bad-bread-explaining)? Obviously this board is a mess.

 

Meanwhile, I will repeatโ€“ being furiously RESISTANT to dealing with questions surrounding board security is "bad optics"' especially when it's all you fake posters in unison, with no dissent, and no natural curiosity (at the least) about an issue that is realistically pressing. It's too obviously fake. Why don't you improve, fakies?

Anonymous ID: e10710 June 7, 2018, 10:47 a.m. No.1660132   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0138

>>1660112

Since the board is completely infested and dominated by AI, this approach is pointless.

 

Humans need to FIGHT

 

There isn't as much need for digging out other activities as there is for organized human resistance to the global AI monster.