Anonymous ID: 52612c June 7, 2018, 12:12 p.m. No.1660766   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Social Security Benefits Paid to

Non

-citizens Granted Deferred

Action for Childhood Arrivals Status

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-reports/A-08-16-50063.pdf

Anonymous ID: 52612c June 7, 2018, 12:21 p.m. No.1660818   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ryan Saavedra

🇺🇸

‏Verified account @RealSaavedra

27m27 minutes ago

 

BREAKING: MSNBC's Joy Reid Threatened Colleague With Violence, Ex-Bosses Say

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/31590/breaking-msnbcs-joy-reid-threatened-colleague-ryan-saavedra

 

Former bosses for MSNBC host Joy Reid claim that she threatened a senior colleague with violence while she worked at a radio station and that she also made homophobic remarks.

 

Fox News reports:

 

Andre Eggelletion, former lead host of the morning show with Reid, recently spoke out about her for the first time in more than a decade, saying Reid created “the most toxic work environment I've ever experienced” and threatened him with violence.

 

“It was a very unhealthy work environment because of her attitude," Eggelletion told

Fox News. "She attacked me on a constant basis while I was there. I was even once threatened with physical violence during a break with her."

 

Lee Michaels, then-national program director for Syndication One, confirmed to Fox News that the incident happened, saying, "It absolutely happened — 100 percent."

 

Michaels told Fox News that he had to work hard to convince Eggelletion to stay at the station and not quit over Reid's attack.

 

Reid refused to cover a story that Eggelletion suggested to her, to which he replied, "There was a dispute over it and I told her, ‘Go ahead and call the manager.'"

 

Reid allegedly replied, "If you ever speak to me like that again I’m coming over there and it’s gonna be me and you."

Anonymous ID: 52612c June 7, 2018, 12:22 p.m. No.1660825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0835

Josh Caplan

‏ @joshdcaplan

9m9 minutes ago

 

CNN: Facebook says an error changed 14 million users' default sharing setting to public for four days in May

12 replies 54 retweets 40 likes

Anonymous ID: 52612c June 7, 2018, 12:26 p.m. No.1660844   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Judicial Watch Uncovers Hidden Strzok Emails in Latest Production of Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Docs—Strzok Email Suggests Clinton Investigation Decision Made in April 2016

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-uncovers-hidden-strzok-emails-latest-production-clinton-lynch-tarmac-meeting-docs-strzok-email-suggests-clinton-investigation-decision-made-april-2016/

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 16 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents related to the June 2016 tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton showing involvement of the FBI’s former Chief of Counterespionage Peter Strzok.

 

The FBI originally informed Judicial Watch they could not locate any records related to the tarmac meeting.  However, in a related FOIA lawsuit, the Justice Department located emails in which Justice Department officials communicated with the FBI and wrote that they had communicated with the FBI.  As a result, by letter dated August 10, 2017, the FBI stated, “Upon further review, we subsequently determined potentially responsive documents may exist. As a result, your [FOIA] request has been reopened …” This is the second batch of documents the FBI produced since telling Judicial Watch they had no tarmac-related records.

 

The new documents were obtained by Judicial Watch in response to an October 2016 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:16-cv-02046)) filed after the Justice Department failed to comply with a July 7, 2016, FOIA request seeking:

 

All FD-302 forms prepared pursuant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server during her tenure.

 

All records of communications between any agent, employee, or representative of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding, concerning, or related to the aforementioned investigation. This request includes, but is not limited to, any related communications with any official, employee, or representative of the Department of Justice, the Executive Office of the President, the Democratic National Committee, and/or the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton.

 

All records related to the meeting between Attorney General Lynch and former President Bill Clinton on June 27, 2016.

 

In a previously unseen email, on July 1, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Bill Priestap, assistant director of FBI counterintelligence, and other FBI officials an article in The New York Times titled then “ Lynch to Remove Herself From Decision Over Clinton Emails, Official Says.” Priestap comments on it, saying: “The meeting in PX is all over CNN TV news this morning …” Strzok replies: “Timing’s not ideal in that it falsely adds to those seeking the ‘this is all choreographed’ narrative. But I don’t think it’s worth changing … later won’t be better.” Priestap responds “Agreed.”

 

In November 2017, Judicial Watch revealed 29 pages of FBI documents showing officials were concerned about a leak that Bill Clinton delayed his aircraft taking off in order to “maneuver” a meeting with the attorney general. The resulting story in the Observer was discussed in this production of documents. The Strzok email was absent from this production.

 

Another Strzok email suggest the decision on the Clinton email matter has been under discussion since April 2016—three months before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he would recommend no prosecution.

 

On July 3, 2016, an email with the subject line “Must Read Security Article” someone from the FBI’s Security Division (SECD) forwards the article in the Observer and reveals concern:

 

I believe that the source quoted in the article is one of the local Phoenix LEO’s [law enforcement officers]. Needless to say that I have contacted the Phoenix office and will contact the local’s [sic] who assisted in an attempt to stem any further damage. This is exactly why our Discretion and Judgement are the foundation of the AG’s trust in our team, which is why we can never violate that trust, like the source did in this article.” [Emphasis in original]

 

More at link!