>>16456151

More ad hominem? You loser.

>FFS. Are you that thin skinned?

To identify a statement as ad hominem is independent from how thick or thin skinned a person is with respect to it.

I see you have completely given up.

Kek, win.

Now SEETHE, bitch.

>>16480665

Looks like

And

Wutsterface

>>16548460

Try a different satellite image provider anon