Everyone MAGA that sees the "Q believers" vs "Q Deniers" thing, I have a thought exercise. Let's say you get Christians and Secular Humanists in the same room to talk about the direction of the country. You agree on just about 100% of the items each group cares about, and then there's that very last question from the Christian crowd that goes "Will you please just join our belief system so we can be complete?"

Now I shouldn't need to tell you which group represents which group, which is where my seemingly unrelated thought directly ties into this rift, and the purpose (yes, purpose) behind it. Do you remember when the reporter finally asked PDJT about Q, and he gave the response "I really don't know anything about it… I hear they love our country… Is that supposed to be a bad thing?". Ironically, President Trump did the most honest thing he could've ever done in that exact moment in that exact way of responding to the question. He left it up to the listener/observer to decide for their own self, which is the biggest confirmation of acknowledgement; zooming right past the understanding of a huge number of Q followers and detractors alike.

This all goes much deeper into some pretty crazy ideas about how this is a reflection of humanity (think mirror; lol), but when you start looking at that the takeaway can be as unique as the perspective going into it, so that's up to you. I just wanted to say the more I think about the totality of all this, the more reverence for what they are pulling off I have. Pulling a diverse world of beliefs and viewpoints into and alliance for Truth, and making that central to the idea behind the whole movement was distilled fucking genius.

This man, and the people that have supported this effort, are probably some of the most intelligent, compassionate, principled, hard working, honest, dedicated, and focused people to have ever existed. History should be swollen with details of this from every angle possible.

Supreme Court Allows Georgia Inmate on Death Row to Die by Firing Squad

The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of an inmate on death row choosing a firing squad as per his request.

In another ruling released today, the Supreme Court decided to allow a death row inmate a firing squad.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of allowing a Georgia death row inmate to alter his execution method from lethal injection to firing squad .

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Elena Kagan , the high court ruled that inmate Michael Nance’s medical aversion to the use of lethal injection is well within his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment , which prevents cruel and unusual punishment.

“A prisoner must identify a readily available alternative method of execution that would significantly reduce the risk of severe pain. In doing so, the prisoner is not confined to proposing a method authorized by the executing State’s law; he may instead ask for a method used in other States,” Kagan wrote.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett lead a dissent joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch. Her argument was that the only manner in which to perform capital punishment in the state is by lethal injection. She said the state doesn’t allow for a firing squad and to do so would go against the state law on the matter.

The tweets about this ruling were as expected.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/supreme-court-allows-georgia-inmate-death-row-die-firing-squad/

>>16625625

>>16625527

>>16625623

You vill eat the pink squirrels and be happy