Anonymous ID: 588e93 July 7, 2022, 10:11 a.m. No.16660682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16510849

>no, i mean in the dough, where Q's posts are listed

gotcha anon

agreed

asterisk is not a bad idea at this point

 

most of the returning eyes are not going to have the time to sift through the breads of nuance

 

should probably be asterisk'd until officially confirmed via anon interaction with Q