Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 12:28 p.m. No.1679799   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9852

>>1679680

Ok to be cautious. Suspicious, even. But throwing out the baby with the bath water is a bad idea. I like Eye. He seems legit to me. I know lots of cops and even an FBI agent or two. They have resources and methods that are just not available to ordinary folks. Especially when it comes to security.

If they are using these accounts for real time comms, as suggested, it's very likely they would be set up by the same person and use methods that make them unlikely to be cracked. They PROBABLY know things about Twitter and it's APIs that most people don't know. Eye has given us a lot of valid information. He has refused comment on a lot of things, quite possibly for very valid reasons, up to and including massive deaths. He has given us one very pointed prediction, and it will be confirmed or invalidated on Monday. Why are people going out of their way to downplay his input? They are mostly famefags, with a sprinkling of concern fags.

I don't care, and I don't mind. Mental filter is enough for me. Raise questions, ok. Shouting and getting hostile when others come up with a different answer is an indicator of severe cognitive dissonance. Beware.

Watch and wait till Monday, and we will know something about Eye and his sources. Until then, keep digging.

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 12:40 p.m. No.1679889   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1679852

Absolutely. Just making a subtle sub-point that we don't have very much knowledge of Twitter internals. Certainly not enough to make definitive pronouncements about what Twitter would do when confronted with an account that was set up by the NSA…

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 3:13 p.m. No.1681208   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1251 >>1270

>>1681044

Too right,, mate.

 

Sounds like something from Alice In Wonderland…

 

"When she got back to the Cheshire Cat, she was surprised to find quite a large crowd collected round it: there was a dispute going on between the executioner, the King, and the Queen, who were all talking at once, while all the rest were quite silent, and looked very uncomfortable.

 

The moment Alice appeared, she was appealed to by all three to settle the question, and they repeated their arguments to her, though, as they all spoke at once, she found it very hard indeed to make out exactly what they said.

 

The executioner’s argument was, that you couldn’t cut off a head unless there was a body to cut it off from: that he had never had to do such a thing before, and he wasn’t going to begin at HIS time of life.

 

The King’s argument was, that anything that had a head could be beheaded, and that you weren’t to talk nonsense.

 

The Queen’s argument was, that if something wasn’t done about it in less than no time she’d have everybody executed, all round. (It was this last remark that had made the whole party look so grave and anxious.)

 

Alice could think of nothing else to say but `It belongs to the Duchess: you’d better ask HER about it.’

 

She’s in prison,’ the Queen said to the executioner:fetch her here.’ And the executioner went off like an arrow.

 

The Cat’s head began fading away the moment he was gone, and, by the time he had come back with the Duchess, it had entirely disappeared; so the King and the executioner ran wildly up and down looking for it, while the rest of the party went back to the game."

 

LOL. Don't get me started on the Mad Hatter…

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 4:19 p.m. No.1681673   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1672003

First pic appears to be a clip / scene (or possibly from some promotional material) from the 2010 Disney movie. I base this on the appearance of the cat. I haven't seen the movie.

But maybe there are hidden meanings to discover in the movie, or the sources of the pictures. Or not, and this is just another rabbit hole (see what I did there?)…

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 7:22 p.m. No.1683318   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3407

>>1682441

The Abelardo Morrell pictures are modified copies (actually photos) of the Tenniel illustrations. They are literal cut and paste of physical paper images from a water-damaged copy of the book.

 

Link to Tenniel images:

http:// www.alice-in-wonderland.net/resources/pictures/alices-adventures-in-wonderland/

 

The Queen of Hearts Shouting at Alice:

  • Original Tenniel image

http:// www.alice-in-wonderland.net/wp-content/uploads/1book28.jpg

 

  • Cut and Paste Photograph by Morell:

https:// i2.wp.com/www.abelardomorell.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/124.jpg

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 7:29 p.m. No.1683407   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3578

>>1683318

Looks to me that the specific source of the images used is not of any particular significance.

One image is from a source that is not even using the complete text. A second source appears to be from a Disney!!! animated film…

There is not much commonality there, other than the actual story, and thanks to Disney, there's not even that. Disney can never remain faithful to the original story lines. They always change (some might say pervert, with some justification in certain cases) the original stories. So The pictures are not significant except as general tropes (images we all recognize, and to some extent, perceive a shared meaning)

Anonymous ID: 309ea6 June 9, 2018, 8:34 p.m. No.1684070   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1675323

Sketchy Link - failed for me.

http://pdfreebooks.org/files/alice-in-wonderland-book.pdf

 

Good link - Not pdf, tho.

http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/