Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 9:46 a.m. No.1669096   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9222

>>1669081

<said while namefagging

NO OUTSIDE COMMS is right, Q doesn't have comms outside of infinitechan. What makes you think that no one else can speak of Q outside of chans and be legit? Especially if they've never claimed to be Q or communicate with Q? If chans aren't for everyone, then how else does the word get out in cyberspace?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 10:52 a.m. No.1669545   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1669222

<discounting the young when they are the ones that control the future of this country

<angry at actions that don't affect you personally

<forgetting that Q has requested that we weaponize twitter (We are at WAR [@].)

<Assuming that anything outside of Q can distract serious autists from Q

<forgetting most of all to enjoy the show and to enjoy life

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 11:06 a.m. No.1669671   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9770

>>1669623

And this is why it's easy for MSM etc to call Qanons a cult. Are we here to worship Q & only Q, or are we here to spread Q's message and support one another in doing so? Thanks Moses, we don't need your commandments though kek

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 11:41 a.m. No.1670015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1023 >>1356

>>1669832

>Q says no outside comms.

>That means there is only Q and Team.

Horrible interpretation. No comms outside of 8chan for Q (team). Q (team) leaks nothing, and does not communicate with any who say that they do. It's that simple.

Aside from that, it's like some want to "own" the rights to Q's intel and for it not to leave the chans, and don't want anyone to support Q outside of chans, THAT, defeats the entire purpose. Q doesn't communicate outside of chans, that doesn't mean that no one else will. Stop worshiping Q.

>Do not glorify us.

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 2:31 p.m. No.1671440   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1772

>>1671356

You do know that it's possible to mentally handle Q drops, Q Research, and to keep watch on a twitter account or few and not forget what Q has stated as well? Hell, I even watch TV at the same time kek. You prefer not to, that's fine. Your persuasion technique is fucked though, if you think that throwing angry words around is going to make anons agree with you. No one's looking for prophets, and Q isn't one either. If it bothers you so much that some anons have an interest that you don't, why haven't you taken your own advice moved the fuck on back to the general thread?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 3:39 p.m. No.1672018   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1671846

I need thicker sauce. Let's say though that it is Dilley, his loss in the end. And another lesson in discernment for the followers. Meantime, we're still watching a movie. Enjoy the show for what it's worth.

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 6:56 p.m. No.1673906   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1673677

You mean the "proof" above where I asked for thicker sauce? Yeah, ok. Ketchup won't convince me, bring Ragu @ least.

Also, why are you insulting the intelligence of anons by assuming that we're all dumb enough to follow blindly, as opposed to eyes wide open? No one has answered that ? yet

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 8, 2018, 6:58 p.m. No.1673929   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1673677

Pardon, I didn't answer your question.

>Why objectivity?

Because I use LOGIC, not some anon's opinion, to discern. Bring logical, factual proof of a larp, not guesses. Dox the fucker if you have to, but bring PROOF.

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 2:40 p.m. No.1680934   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1680908

>you're going to be excommunicated from the last chapter.

Huh? Is this a scare tactic? Why does this have a religious connotation to it? Also how would you know about a "last chapter" in regards to Q & what Q is doing with this movement? Who does the actual "excommunication" that you speak of?

Last I checked, the choice is ALWAYS ours

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 5:32 p.m. No.1682348   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2379

I wonder if there'd be so much doubt if this thread was about @prayingmedic. I mean, he's pretty popular, with 66.6K followers, must be doing something wrong & in cahoots with @Jack, right?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 5:37 p.m. No.1682390   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1682355

#1. Be entertaining.

#2. Have a sense of humor.

#3. Stand for something that people stand for, and they may stand with you.

#4. Get mention in Q Research, where thousands of eyes are already there.

Not too difficult, right?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 5:43 p.m. No.1682455   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2500

>>1682399

I've wondered a few times whether some of these angry guys are actually not shills, but anons with not so popular twitter accounts, being shadowbanned & blocked all over the place, feeling a bitโ€ฆenviousโ€ฆthat an alleged 20 something year-old guy has all of this charisma that they don't have. Larp or not, why be so upset about people spending their time with it (AND on actual Q research at the same time)?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 5:46 p.m. No.1682483   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1682451

Either what eye has said will happen will come to pass, or it won't. No one dies either way (I hope). And you're right, Q has already alluded to the 11th yet didn't say why. Someone else (eye) says why, and it's either true, or not 50/50 until 6/12 when we all know for sure. Time will tell, simple.

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 9, 2018, 8:49 p.m. No.1684205   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7249 >>7302

>>1684042

In context, BO's were famefagging & claiming private comms with Q. This post clarified tat it was a lie, and that anyone else who claimed the same would be lying. Also that Q doesn't post anywhere else other the infinitechan.

"NO comms made outside of this platform" wasn't an instruction to anons. It didn't mean not to speak of Q outside of Q Research. Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of pic related here โ†’ >>1684151 ?

Anonymous ID: 4cabc9 June 10, 2018, 10:15 a.m. No.1688645   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1688569

Follow the money, itโ€™s the key.

Follow the bloodline.

Follow the news.

Follow the wives.

Follow the husbands.

Follow the crumbs.

FOLLOW THE LIGHT.

Follow the pen.

Follow the timeline.

Follow the EOs.