>>1666982

Why does BO ban anyone that questions his authority?

Is this board about BO?

Why do we do so many "anons" seem to slavishly thank BO over and over, to attack anyone that questions if he is comped, if he is safe, if he has been replaced by clowns, or asks for confirmation related to any of the preceding. Why does BO talk like an infant (always with crude, strictly "chan cliche" language)?

It doesn't make sense. This isn't a game. The clowns aren't leaving an actual human anon unmolested to leave the overthrow of their global empire. At the very least, we would expect BO to admit that there is danger, and to understand the need for vigilance– not fight against it furiously, with lots of fake and embarrassing "bantz".>>1666982

>>1667214

Why do you ban everyone that brings up the obvious issues of security surrounding this board and your role? It is obvious that the clowns could take out any human and then take over the board– do you deny this? Then why refuse to address it? That makes no sense.

>>1667226

Why do fake anons, all in unison, attack any anon that brings up the issue of BO in relation to board security and clown-comping? Not realistic response, especially not in unison, especially not so many bot-like low-tier posts, swarming and furious.

This is not /ProtectBOAtAllCostsResearch

Nor is it a game.

Why is BO treated like a god?

It stinks to high heaven of fakeness

There are obviously bots swarming

Why the odd behavior?

Explain it.

>>1667245

Why doesn't BO delete that open bots posts, when we know that the AI is trying to gain control through the tacit consent of humans?

Why didn't BO delete fake Q posts, when they were extremely disruptive and a source of severe potential disinformation?

Why a "no bans" policy that allows bots to flourish, but which he then suspends at will when "HE" is questioned?

Use Logic

>>1667280

FIGHT