Is it your favorite bread ever because you fed the retarded Mason shills or because you left out real anons notables including more information about the ADL so you could lulz with your buddies?
>My goal is championing our culture and crushing our enemy, MOS/JIDF.
The fact that we're not here to realize your personal goals aside, there are more than Mossad/JIDF (Confirmed by Q) and people who would otherwise be your allies in purging the kike scum are attacked simply for acknowledging that the evil transcends tribal boundaries. I've noticed two things.
First thing, you have the same people blowing smoke up your ass every thread you bake, these same people are here all day just driving whatever is most disruptive, whether it be Freddy, David Wilcuck, Porn Slide, you name it, they're just here to disrupt.
Second thing, the same people who blow smoke up your ass go out of their way to blow smoke up BO/BV's ass and use the denial of everybody is a Mason shill as a tool to raise their argument via 'Appeal To Authority' fallacies. They use this tool to attack the anons I described earlier and suck on our nuts about how great we are in hopes we will continue to implicitly consent to their faggotry which is allowed because Freedom of Speech is vital including speech against the staff. That being said Appeal to Authority and Consensus Cracking are very powerful tools which potentially undermine the stability and efficiency of this board and as stewards of the community we cannot implicitly consent to these attacks by staying silent.
Next, this activity is to force a situation. Our rules and allocation of responsibility are very effective at keeping every party in check. BO/BV's don't dictate content, Bakers don't dictate who can and cannot post and this separation of responsibilities means BO/BV and Bakers cannot be easily used against eachother unless either party chooses to disrupt the natural balance of things. This is the reason I am coming to you as Anon, to advise you of these things, violating this boundary is exactly what they want. You are free to disregard this post or to take it under advisement, that's the beauty of Free Speech and the beauty of thinking for yourself.
>Your house your rules.
It's OUR house the Anons, the Bakers, the Lurkers, the Shills and last but not least Q make this board what it is, not the staff. Which is why this is not an official BV post. All I can do is bring this information to your attention and you and the people that lurk can choose what or what not to do with it. This is just the latest in targeted approaches to undermine the values of this community, pit us against one another, and otherwise distract us. They obviously won't stop but it is this Anons opinion that they are using you as a tool for their own purposes and not everybody who speaks out against them is a shill (but some are). The group is just playing everybody, they don't care about the Genocide or the truth they just want to be faggots.
> I'm 100% patriot acting in good-faith in support of QR, God & Country.
This is not in question.
>No disrespect for your work personally, you BV’s have been solid for months, but your office has sheltered two bad actors who used banning/censorship and larp/discrediting against us. BO is the only constant.
Our office held AFLB and Tits for so long much against my constant pointing out how fucked they are to our community. They were allowed to stay because BO is willing to give people the benefit of the doubt but I assure you I am an OG BV who did not sit around happily while those two colossal fucks fucked you and everybody else over. Hindsight is 20/20
>But I don't understand what's being argued by your Appeal to Authority/Consensus Cracking concern.
Pic related, this is botposting, even BO agrees this is botposting. However this botposter has people that follow whoever takes the bait and consensus cracks and gaslights whoever is stupid enough to take the bait. Do you notice a trend of subject matter? Notice, we don't give a shit about the subject matter, we care about the tactics being employed here and because we can see post histories and anons can't it makes it trivial for us to see who's been here being disruptive all day. And those same people egg you on while you attack and ignore others.
>do, and it's blackpilling af to learn that everyone expressing support for me
It's not everybody, we certainly support you, it's about 4 "Anons" who bandwagon when you bake and take you and the community for a ride by amplifying and distorting the message.
>My first impulse was to ask for evidence
You deserve evidence, those posters attempted to justify botspam and appeal to authority arguments because of the importance of their subject matter, a premise which was rejected.
>I'm also thrown by why you couldn't use a trip to tell me these things yet still referenced the behind-the-scenes mod's view of IP histories to justify them
I don't think being Anon and telling you what's happening diminishes from what I'm telling you.
>Finally, why was there a BO/BV posting ban histories and expressing being comfy on bread 5752 if it's known by you guys I was only participating in feeding known bad actors?
Ban histories are public information and can be found in the board log, BO wasn't around and I was the only BV on staff on that night. Whoever posted the ban history is not one of the staff.
>I was only participating in feeding known bad actors?
Clam, it's not your fault like I said earlier this is the latest in targeted approaches to undermine the values of this community including trying to get us to reneg on the JQ. Being the most polarizing baker means you are the easiest to use as a tool for their ends. All I want is you to be cognizant of this situation and not get lost in the circlejerk next time you bake.
Here's two shill accounts pushing (((Roger Stone))). Included in Notables.
Here's one of the people who supported you that night, they're still botposting to this day. They have THOUSANDS of posts on this board.
I also noticed you're always in a hurry to put in notables with BO calling out the Mason kike but didn't bother to put >>4558737 in notables, you were also baking when BO posted it. Here's two better caps of (((Roger Stone))) shills, which you also included as notable. Here's a cap of another 'Anon' that "supports" you.
Here's their "support"
Another one off with 'support'
Oh look, they're not even going to hide they're gaslighting and consensus cracking and that they're using you knowingly or unknowingly to achieve their goals.
More fake and gay roger stone support, oh look jews.
Points out Washington was a Mason, this is how you treat that Anon while you're circlejerking with your buddies.
> >>4509830, >>4509857, >>4509907 (((JIDF))) to Goyim: It's the Masons!!! Not Jooooobs!!!
You chose not to include notables: >>4505568, >>4508703
>>4505568 A significant amount of Anons participated in this Silver discussion, yet it was not deemed notable after someone spent two threads trying to explain how it was the least kiked way to buy silver, you thought it was more important to circlejerk with your buddies instead of inform your fellow anons how to kike the kikes.
>>4508703 This goes against your beliefs that it must only be the Jews despite clear indication by Q that this is not the case. When someone goes to educate you and the rest of the Anons it's ignored in lieu of fluff.
You get the benefit of the doubt until it becomes apparent you are not here for the truth, if you choose to continue to circlejerk and attack Anons who disagree with you while claiming you have the support of BO/BV's further action will be taken. We will not protect the Vatican, the Muslims or the Jews but we will not let one side of the proverbial triangle play unfairly with Appeal to Authority arguments and Consensus Cracking.
And the moron shills should stop sharing the same folder of stale as fuck memes, even when you IP hop it's trivial to track you lazy fucking retards.
And for the record, these missing notables is what prompted this discussion in the first place. It's undeniably good information, relevant to the topic at hand in those threads, it has support from multiple anons and instead of doing your job and putting dug information into the bake you wasted everybodies time playing into the circlejerk. Anons pointed out that you put what you agree is a malicious anon in notables and you and the rest of them attacked them and called them shills, this behavior is not acceptable while also claiming you have BO/BV's support, nobody has BO/BV's support to call everybody who disagree's with you a shill period. Everybody has BO/BV's full support to speak FREELY without getting banned.
You are free to acknowledge this situation or keep on keeping on. As it stands you have the benefit of the doubt, but life is the summation of the choices we make. Next time when what happened during the manufactured (((Triggering))) happens again the situation will be officially addressed at length. Where you want to be when that happens is up to you.
>it seems to me the jidf sweatshop, right about now, would want to spam breads with JQ material, just to get called out as spambots
This is also very likely, which is why freedom of speech is critical. Including the freedom to have and read this discussion. The shills can't get away with pitting us against one another if we're aware of their games, hence this discussion.
>shilling above and told me to "try harder"
I feel no reason to use a capcode, in fact I think it's bait for Alinsky style framing. I think the shills think this is a golden opportunity when in fact it is bait. They cannot hide if the Admins are not complicit. Anybody can point out the round the clock narrative pushing done by multiple parties by downloading the .json files of the threads and comparing the shilling across threads. When the same narratives are pushed in 4 hour+ chunks someone is pushing the narrative, when they misconstrue BO/BV's non-support of one thing as support for their narrative discussion must be opened. Paid or not, consensus cracking and appeal to authority arguments are weak.
You can attack the data or not, you do not dictate the terms in which I deliver it. A lot of concern over something other than the argument given. It's ok bait but you'll have to do better than that. Nothing stated is incorrect.
Keep trying.
First, I acknowledge that you did include BO's notable and that I am in the wrong, sorry about that.
>If you do ban me, I won’t hop or evade it.
Banning you is not on the table, all I wanted to do was bring this to your attention. I mean, come on, we don't ban Freddy or Tiresias you think we're going to ban you?
>a) include all notes that at least 2 anons nom that aren't obvs fake/irrelevant/unsubstantiated factual claims, including general diggs on catholicism/freemasonry even if the posts claim those institutions are the central/controlling arm influencing world events and not Jews/Israel, bc we unbiased
I think this goes with being fair and would ask this of any baker.
>b) stop baiting shills. Specifically: don’t shitpost at them, don’t put known-shill posts in notes just for lulz/examples of stupidity, use little to no ((( ))) & other J-taunting idioms in notes summaries, bc too much heat for too little benefit, most anons claiming to appreciate are fake anyway
I'm not going to say you can't shitpost on people or use ((())) or call kikes kikes but dont let it distract you from doing the things the rest of the community relies on a baker to do while you're doing it. That's really all I ask, once notables start getting missed I have to say something.
>c) don’t reject a nomination while expressing opinion of “must be a shill” bc too hard to tell who’s who, risk of alienating real anons too great
This is becoming more important as time passes and things come up that challenge our understanding of the world around us. I would appreciate it if you would remember this in the future.
>d) don’t reject a nomination just bc contains advice to purchase/use a product or give financial/health advice unless obvs repeat spam/advertisement w/no otherwise edifying exposition/content
I think the silver and gold thing is relevant because it's been pointed at by Q and Anons have a strong argument for why metals are the safest route to ensuring you have money in whatever is coming. With POTUS' public backing in previous years and Q's confirmation that we have the Gold (POTUS had previously said he'd go back to metals but we don't have the gold) I think it's not necessarily shilling to tell people where to buy metals at without paying kike prices for aspects of coins that don't matter. I just thought it was a good notable with long term ramifications for the people in our community. It's not often the ultra rich aren't the ones with the inside scoop. I think of POTUS or Q could say explicitly 'buy metals' they would but if they did all hell would break loose.
>e) don’t reference “Mossad Massacre” or “The Triggering” bc was fake, why advertise shills took baker for a ride
I again won't tell you what you can or can't say, but yes evidence does suggest it was fake and gay.
>f) don’t reference or post BO/BV links/caps to bolster any argument other than clarifying logistics of post itself (when/what/who), BO/BV position is support of free speech, neutral re: content, and such practices commit/encourage Appeal to Authority fallacies and other avenues shills exploit
I fixed this to remove
>but esp. not to fuel/push the “We are pro-discussion of JQ” argument bc
because it is not acceptable for any party to use our fake and gay 'authority' to elevate the authenticity of their argument, not just the pro-JQ crowd.
>removes a problem from everyone else's plate.
You are not a problem, shills are going to shill and if you leave they win. They went all out that night and you were just doing what you normally do. They're professionals, they're patient, they're well manned and well resourced. They came with a plan and we got a bit of egg on our face not just you, we. You have lost no respect from me it's what we do from here on out that matters. I didn't make this series of posts to attack you because I don't like you, I made this series of posts because I do like you, I noticed a negative trend and knew that if I brought it to your attention you would take it to heart and address it which you have. As far as I'm concerned we're good to go.
You are also using the false equivalency of not calling everybody you disagree with a shill while you're baking for censoring the JQ. Nobody gets censored here so fear monger about whatever you want the proof discussing the JQ is on the table is in the logs and the fact we have a literal running series of JQ threads. Censorship argument == dead
>making it seem like the ONLY people who supported him were shills.
Nobody but you said everybody.
>Even the snapshot of my posts you selected there doesn't make someone a shill.
Your history is less than 24 hours in length, therefore your 'I've been here a year check my post history to prove it' statement is a non starter.
>I have zero apoligies about posting about the jewish supremacy issue.
And there is no problem with the thread. You are conflating two issues.
>You've shown every shill red flag in the book.
Ah yes, enforcing free and equally accessible speech is definitely #1 on the list of the ADL's things to do. I'm sure that's the first thing they teach at Mossad hasbara school
>If this is the way things run behind the scenes here
Kek, everything happened in the open in public, it couldn't be more transparent.
I dont know what you're calling out, there's literally no censorship on the board. Nobody put a gun to bakers head, the first post says you can take the information and ignore it or do what you want but we are stepping up our calling out of the botposting rings. Baker has been a strong ally to us and required more information to make a decision about specific things. Notice we dissuaded baker from not talking about the JQ or using ((())) or shitposting on the jews, it was simply required that all the notables make it into the bread and that the thread isn't derailed too long by baker himself, understandable if you care about the productivity which baker obviously does considering they've put mountains of time into this place. They are still free to make their decisions about their conduct.
All the evidence that is relevant to your claims contradicts the premise of everything you've stated here, I think you are triggered we're wise to your faggots game and you're losing. You faggots must really be hurting for money.
https://cheekyvideos.net/murdoch/Shills.html
>So are you gonna sell me the gun or not
Only if you promise to shoot yourself.
Kek, sorry buddy, I came to talk to Clam not you Mr. Too Stupid to know how IP's and an imageboard works. Learn about the board log next and tell us about all the JQ content deletions.
Let me spell it out for you, since AFLB has been fired there have been 0 deletions of a post due to the fact it brought up the Jews.
>More than anything, I hate them for what they do to our minds.
Ah fuck those bitches, we livin' and we're one of the last groups that has to deal with these subversive faggots. Don't let it eat at you for too long, what's done is done shills gonna shill. No worries.
>What a kike reversal clinic you just put on while hiding behind your claimed BV status which if true you are clearly abusing.
I presented my argument, points you haven't bothered to attack because you can't you are trying to create an entirely new argument based on my reaction to your fallacies. Say what you want, that is your right here but you are not entitled to any more of my time. Nice digits though.
>It's the Jesuits
Pic related
>It's the Red Cross
Confirmed by Q
>It's the Globalists
Confirmed by POTUS
>It's the Democrats
>It's the Republicans
Confirmed by POTUS and anybody who knows about the Neocons and the Dems
>It's China
Confirmed by Pence and Q
>It's Russia
It's not Russia, they've always worked with Assad and against Israel and the Deepstate. POTUS and Putin have established strong working relationships and have used that relationship to free Syria from (((ISIS))).
>It's the Bolsheviks
Yep
>It's the Bilderbergs
Also true
>It's the CFR
Obviously true.
>It's the Mafia
What do you mean Mafia? The CGF is a mafia, there's many family crime syndicates, you know the same families you're covering for now.
>It's the Trilateral
The Trilateral Commission is obviously part of it
>It's the Muslims
The Saudi's are part of the triangle that was neutralized early on, ISIS was created by Israel and the United States, the muslims have complicity parties too.
>It's the Jesters
I'm not aware of this group
>It's the Ashkenazi
Also part of the group.
>It's the CIA
It's not the CIA? Really?
>It's Proj. Paperclip
I see why you want to try to clear the CIA, that wasn't kike propaganda at all.
>It's the Reptillians
Always have to hit the disinfo you paid your mouthpieces to mislead the population with, otherwise why bother paying for it in the first place.
>It's the KKK
That group started by the Dems which everybody is aware of are evil little kikes? Also True.
>It's the Nazis
The average Nazi was a guy protecting his family and doing what he thought he needed to do. There's nothing wrong with the average Nazi. The SS are evil occultist fucks though, and they are responsible for the CIA, Operation Paperclip, the Bushes. For those following along. When someone is insistent on their message being the only valid truth you should look to see what specifically they are hoping to frame your mindset as. In this case it's that the Bushes, the CIA and everybody else on this list did nothing wrong.
>It's Caesar
Kek.
>It's the Annunaki
Again, gotta get that disinfo in there, otherwise why pay for it.
>It's RA
Oh now you're covering for the 4500 year old fertility sun/moon worship death cult. Hello ADL. I see you.
>It's the Pleidians
Again, gotta get that disinfo in there, otherwise why pay for it.
>It's the Clintons
I'm pretty sure it is the Clintons.
>It's the Bush's
It most certainly is is Bushes, confirmed by Q and POTUS.
Are you saying you know more than POTUS and Q? Are they misleading us? They acknowledged that Israel is a monster to our country, they ended 3 wars for Israel, they got rid of ISIS and Assad is now free. I guess where results are concerned when it comes to not working for Israel POTUS and Q have and continue to deliver. This kind of bait only works when you can bring your buddies in to back you up and slide the thread. This thread is infinite, slow and if you do bring your buddies in here it'll be obvious how you operate because I can go for forever and eventually you will run out of content, start repeating yourself and then the dumbest of the goyim will finally know as well. Go on, make my existential existence, play it all out faggot, I'll get to debunking your propaganda when I feel like it.
>Expecting a BV of /qresearch/ to not take Q seriously.
>Expecting a BV of /qresearch/ to not trust POTUS.
>Those are my ids in this little thread (i guess they update and change over time???
Pretending not to know how an imageboard works after allegedly being here a year is also played out. You are either criminally stupid or deliberately obtuse, doesn't matter to me.
>I thought i wasnt getting any more of your time kike??
You made it too easy to point out how what you're shilling goes against Q and POTUS.
>And again you virtue signal about your technical knowledge of the board as if it would offend me?
Discrediting your assertion is not virtue signaling. Also, you're supposed to lurk 2 years before posting "Anon".
>Youre having a tough time today sparky
Not really, I already told you I can do this all day.
>Crypto jew
Are you too lazy to find out their real names? Hamburg, Rothschild, Payseur, the Holy See.
>Front companies
Which ones, FANG? InQTel? I can go for months bro.
>Puppets
Like the ones owned by Citibank owned by Prince Al-Waleed a Saudi Royal (ie not a jew)
>How connections to all of those things lead to israel.
All of them lead exclusively to Israel? 100% of them? What's Q's problem with the Pope then?
>using appeal to authority ( but but Ivanka is jewish therrfore you should stop picking on jews)
Nobody but you said this.
>The reason you cant have a real discussion .
I think the discussion is going wonderfully, I'm sorry you're not satisfied.
>Lets go back to the beginning before you tangled everything up with kikery.
No, come up with new material faggot so I can absolutely continue to destroy your pathetic playbook. If you'd like to address specific points I'd be glad to hear them however you get to argue your "argument" yourself.
Both are guilty.
> Better luck next time eh?
Triggered Leaf Detected.
>if there is an arbitrary limit to the amount of posts a baker can make during baking, let me know
There is not.
>I am gathering some sponsors and others who help donating and paying. Docs are definitely legit.
>It sucks that they want money for it, but the docs are legit.
>This is going to be the real truth about 9/11, if you want it or not. So, stfu shill.
>We'll have to wait until the key is released to public or if someone else with enough money buys it and leaks it
>If Q says it is fake, I am inclined to even research it further since Q also said that Disinfo is necessary.
It's locked because it's an advertisement for a scam dressed up as a research thread, it's not deleted because it needs to be reviewed by BO.
https://voat.co/v/QRV/2947193/16005701
Claimed.
The whole thing smells like faggotry I don't care about.
Maybe you're too stupid to understand so I'll spell it out for you.
None of us give a fucking shit about your beef with v/GA. None of us. Nobody in v/GA is able to influence how our board and our voat are ran therefore they are irrelevant to us. Stop acting like a fucking kike.
Let me explain to you why nothing you say is relevant.
1 - Q can, at a moments notice call out anybody or anything. At a moments notice Q can alert at least 2.1 million people to something relevant to their interests to include situations where Baruch was fired and when BO was instructed to create QRV. Everybody in the movement can be alerted in less than 24 hours. Even if the shills win they lose.
2 - Even if you are right and PuttItOut and v/GA are shills it's irrelevant to our interests. Q instructed the creation of QRV therefore we are not leaving Voat until we are forced off. There has been no indication we will be forced off and every indication that our presence is accepted and our actions are appreciated.
3 - Putt has been nothing but good to us, he could have easily just banned v/theawakening and banned v/QRV and he didn't. Instead he worked to make sure both communities were represented and went out of his way to implement code so that both could be easily viewed.
4 - We already told the community we would tell them if a site admin forced us to change how we moderate, since we have not raised that alarm you can be sure it has not happened.
>you have no reason to trust these people.
If this is all you're worried about you could have just asked if we trusted anybody but ourselves, POTUS, and Q. The answer to which would be "No". You're mistaking courtesy for trust. We lost nothing by being courteous. Nobody is getting shit from us and we are not changing how the community expects us to do things. Look how hard the community had to pull teeth to get fucking birthday graphics ffs and it was requested by people we actually RESPECT.
Just. Stop. Concernfagging. We have it under control.
Now there's proof you're using alts. You used your concernfagging about Putt to try to push us taking an official position on v/GA.
>but you first called me a namefag
Nobody called you a namefag, I dont even know your name.
> then you called me a kike for making a single post to reference what I meant by "let's see how things play out".
We're not on your team, we don't care about v/GA mods. BO obliged you by answering about Putt because it is relevant to our community. v/GA mods (as much as it triggers you) have nothing to do with us.
>Now you're calling me a concernfag for defending myself from being called a kike because I… care too much.
I stand by my assessment.
>You could've dropped it after my dropping the link here >>4689977 but instead you pushed me to explain myself by acting like a faggot.
I'm not going to implicitly consent to the position you think we should have on v/GA. Nice try though.
>This is the first time I've brought my concerns with Voat
It's already been established why your concerns are irrelevant.
>Remember, anons are not divided. But, they certainly would have us be divided. It's good that we don't always agree. The multiple angles of understanding will strengthen us.
Until you try to convince the community instead of us you are just a faggot with an agenda like every other faggot with an agenda.
Let me guess, you're the same dipshit who early on tried to get us to take a stance against ProtectVoat by inviting us to be mods of whatever gay shit you have going on RealProtectVoat. Fuck off dude, we won't explicitly consent to your crusade on Voat and we won't implicitly consent to it either.
Let's start again, from the beginning.
>You ought to know who I am by my responding to this.
We dont know who you are.
>we could always just let it go and see how it plays out
There is no we.
>That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.
Non starter, Q specifically asked for QRV, you think you know more than Q and that just shows how seriously you should not be taken. You are here to spread Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
>The catch, though, is that the guy won't reveal anything about the person, so we can't vet them in any way.
Not my problem.
>gain, for all we know, we could be sending loads of people to a honeypot.
Look up 'Total Informational Awareness' and then come back and tell me Q doesn't know everything. Q could order the calculation of the time your dick gets hard in the morning.
>I had no idea BO was being harassed by Srayzie.
A bit of shade is not harassment. We also don't need whatever gay version of white knighting you're doing here.
>are you really so fucking stupid that you'd fall for their framing this as a "beef" between groups on Voat?
Whatever 'this' is doesn't effect us. Unless you are going to continue with your assertion that Q is leading his supporters to a honeypot.
>They want to put regular anons against the moderators at the board.
We participate anonymously just fine, you're the only reason I ever bothered to talk to Srayzie.
>These guys are shills.
If true they have no power here, or on Voat. Reread >>4696435
>You have no reason to believe I'm trying to divide anyone
Kek, but Q doesn't know about Putt's new partner amirite?
>My only intention was to root out the faggot infiltrators
You are 5 months too late.
>My only role in this was to use that experience to steer anons and normies clear of the faggots trying to spoil the bunch. How you think that makes me a kike is beyond me.
You are the one who alluded to Q leading his supporters to a honeypot, not me.
First posts made around the same time you showed up concernfagging to BO about Putt.
>I agreed to drop it. You continued things.
No no, these are you too. >>4689262 >>4689977
>I never would've acted like a concernfag if you didn't push me to explain things more in depth.
You've been self admittedly concern fagging since you baited BO with the Putt Question.
>I literally told you I'd try to contain things to Voat.
Then why are you here.
>then you called me a kike for making a single post to reference what I meant by "let's see how things play out".
Wrong this is why you were labeled a kike >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out
Who the fuck is we?
>The only reason I elaborated on the situation was because you fell to shill tactics, got disoriented, and lashed out at me.
This is decent bait.
>I pushed too much and over explained things.
You made many assumptions too, including ones based on your misunderstanding of what was typed.
> I'm going back to my post, as you should.
This is arguably my post.
>You used your concernfagging about Putt to try to push us taking an official position on v/GA.
Let me quote you >That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us.
>I have no team, faggot. Quit trying to put me on teams.
I'm still waiting on who the 'we' is in >we could always just let it go and see how it plays out
>I can see you think that. You can't just keep repeating that to make it more true…
There is nothing the people you are fighting with can do to us.
>Why are you trying to pin other usernames or identities on me?
You're the one who keeps saying we know who you are.
>I've never modded ANYTHING.
Is this why you don't know we can't see who the users on Voat are? Is this why you think we know who you are?
>I've never tried to get any mods from anywhere to do anything besides when I would fuck with GA mods to coax them in to outing themselves.
What does this have to do with QRV?
>This going back and forth is making the both of us look like assholes.
This is the asshole of the internet.
Fixed.
All you did was convince v/GA that we were with you doxxing them which is against the site rules and will get us kicked off Voat. You're not a very convincing "friend".
>I'd bet that was one of those faggots doing it to themselves.
If true you're just helping them be the victims, did you ever stop to consider that?
>Want me to do that?
No.
Have a good night sperganon.
Dude if you're about to pull some unexpected Scooby Doo shit be my guest.
I fucking love this thread.
>Youve successfully thrown the accountability of this place into question for me.
I'm sorry you're offended by the fact pro-JQ botspam was called out. Its' still allowed to continue on it helps me make my point. It was nice bait shitting the bread with your stale JQ infographics but I've known that at some point Q would ideologically conflict with /pol/'s gas the kikes race war now otherwise Kampfy would have let them stay.
>If an anon expresses an argument that states jews control the vatican, as well as pull strings elsewhere, does that make him a shill???
Are you going to argue my initial argument against me? Cool. Are you trying to pretend you're not samefagging? I can't tell what you think anymore, you can't even tell who you're conversing with >>4716667 I bet this isn't the only thread you samefag in.
>repeatedly tried to label anyone who disagrees with YOU as being against this entire board which isn't true.
You are the only one who said everybody, Roger Stone shills and the JIDF JQ bot were all that was called out. Baker did include the JIDF JQ bot post and shat on everyone who called it out with the shills that night. Your continued effort to move the goalposts, use emotional bait and otherwise misdirect have and will continue to fail, but please stay because you allow me to consistently and clearly articulate the same points over and over and over. Maybe you think you're wasting my time, maybe you think you can trigger me into doing something stupid so you can cause a scene. I like free speech, I could do this with you all day.
>Just wanted to raise the alarm is all.
Appreciate it. Baker did include a known spamfaggot in the notables and did shit on Anons who pointed it out.
Removing a baker is really a last resort option. It's much better this way. The alternative devolves into censorship.
>left that shit in the notables for multiple breads
I'm happy about this because early on it was decided that editing another bakers notables is not acceptable. It implies that even though other bakers disagreed they still saw fit to preserve the integrity of the system we have in place.
This is a mirror example of the situation a few weeks ago with different content. Opinionated baker includes propaganda they agree with and assumes everybody who has a problem with it is a shill. The botspam targets what it figures are the largest subgroups of the Q movement, the people who are woke to the Satanists and call the subversive pedovore baby rapists Satanists and the people who are woke to the Jews and call the subversive pedovore baby rapists Jews. There is both a lot of truth and room for understanding from both points of view, I think there are also a lot of purists in either party which makes it easy to make this a wedge issue.
Overzealous Patriots and/or trolls/shills spam polarizing viewpoint.
Patriots address the spam, it's volume in itself is good bait, the intellectual dishonesty makes it great bait.
(((Someone))) fuels the argument from both sides, get the goyim fighting over what to call the evil pedovore baby rapists. Instead of cataloging the demise of said evil pedovore baby rapists.
Patriots on both sides get roped in, both sides know they speak the truth and therefore the other side must be shilling.
(((Someone))) uses confirmation bias to keep people who would otherwise agree on 70% of everything else from working together over the 30% they healthily will not agree on.
In regards to actionable information, the baker in question is still good to go. The baker has been steady for months and it seems this is a recent issue. The post histories of the spammers was again put into the General thread so that baker can see that the Anons calling out the spam notable were in fact right and therefore not shills. Baker is free to make a choice about what to do with that information. If another problem like this happens with the same baker I will have enough reason to tell baker to take a break for a while.
>activate spam bots pretending to question jews
Sauce?
>activate pro israel comped BV
Sauce?
>distort perception amongst bakers in META.
Sauce?
>Puts up a disengenuous phony front that its equally all the bad guys fault
All bad guys are technically bad you fucking retard
>no one should prioritize or emphasize israel.
Sauce?
Those are some serious allegations, serious enough that BO should seek my removal if true. I insist you present your evidence so it can be thoroughly examined by BO. Fuck if true I would fire myself.
>defending megajew shill who was outted last night.
How is this notable defending Megajew? Is this not what you're talking about? This is the only interaction I've seen between megajew and the current baker (who is currently looking for a handoff)
>>4783461 Was fbianon strzok or page because no texts from 06/18/-12/14/2016 (anons theory pb bun >>4783536)
It doesn't look like baker is making a comment one way or another on Megajew, it looks like baker found the OIG report notable >>4783536 and went out of their way to pick up the slack for lazy megajew by sourcing the originally relevant posts.
>baker is defending same shill again tonight
I just went though bakers history, he does not say a word about megajew, the megajew post that was put in was a notable request from a previous bread specifically regarding the OIG report.
3980ef and 6d6559 are mad 3980ef's post calling out megajew was not made notable (pics related). That is not grounds for baker removal, it is not even the same baker as last night. Not including your notable is not 'defending' megajew. Including megajews nomination of a post megajew didn't even make is not defending megajew, that's being a baker and including notables.
>a lot of stupid shit and legitimate shill posts
Yeah there has been some hiccups lately but I'm not seeing it in this instance.
And for the record, it's not even the same baker as yesterday.
It's actually Gephi.
>i gotta stop letting megajew get under my skin I guess??
You should commit to this. Every baker is not a shill because they include something you don't like in the notables.
Bakers discretion, feel free to test it out and bake.
>blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
l concur, I think the bread has been tasty lately. Thank you bakers. I would also like to say good job on the deltas.
That's not a bunker.