Anonymous ID: aef03b March 26, 2019, 1:07 a.m. No.5899116   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2826

[RBG]

The splice @19:56 IS in fact [RBG] speaking over a lady BUT the lady was speaking about something totally different ending in a word that IS NOT connected to the sentence that comes before [RBG's] interruption.

 

"The Mississippi Supreme Court ignored what this court had already said about history being relevant and the broader point [RBG interruption] what(?) everything [RBG speaks]

 

Who has good ears? Help me out.

Anonymous ID: aef03b March 26, 2019, 1:21 a.m. No.5899204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Con't>>5899116

 

What if there's another court case that this attorney argued in front of the Supreme Court that has this interruption in it.