So what is the deal in here anons are jidf pretending to be BV's
TBH I don't understand the accusation or if you even are accusing me
I've never been in META before
tbh not sure If I was responding to a shill or an actual BV. When I see people downplaying the JQ it sets off a red flag. Can an actual BV here chime in?? did you guys really get on the triggering bakers case or something?? news to me
checks watch
it seems to me the jidf sweatshop, right about now, would want to spam breads with JQ material, just to get called out as spambots, and then be able to turn around and declare the entire JQ subject to be a cabal psyop. And thus don't you dare question the jew.
Are we suuuuuure that isn't what is happening here
>4b0d26
Thanks. But given the sticky on global and the level of shilling lately I dont think it's too much to ask to have you prove that you're a BV right now and post with a tripcode or whatever. You more or less accused me of shilling above and told me to "try harder"
don't think you would feel that way if you actually took a close look at my history but it's possible I guess. You a real BV?
youll have to excuse me Ive been here maybe a year at most and this place is one of the biggest things that connected the JQ dots for me
>Appeal to authority arguments are weak
The problem is, everything you've said is one. And now you're refusing to show your official dicpick?
nigga you scarin me
If you're not a shill you certainly behave like one. If you really are a BV I am genuinely not impressed with how you've handled this. Highly suspect at this point.
is this fartontoast? ill be damned if you dont type just like him
Hope BO can comment on this earlier…this is way too reddit-esque for me
>a) include all notes that at least 2 anons nom that aren't obvs fake/irrelevant/unsubstantiated factual claims, including general diggs on catholicism/freemasonry even if the posts claim those institutions are the central/controlling arm influencing world events and not Jews/Israel, bc we unbiased
exactly…
>it's blackpilling af to learn that everyone expressing support for me has shown evidence in their post history of being a bad actor
that isn't true. I was there that night. This guy has posted pictures of some blatantly obvious shills and hasn't mentioned all the other anons who appreciated the sight of a baker not walking on eggshells around the JQ. I see no proof that "Everyone" who supported you is a shill.
Look how the guy is responding to my questions. The opposite of what I have seen in the responses that I have read from BO. This whole conversation reeks.
> If BV called you out as a shill, he likely has a hash history to prove it. Would like to see it actually, would be good to add that data to this discussion, so anyone else that stumbles in here knows what you're raising a flag over is fake.
Exactly. I welcome it actually. I was wondering why he hadn't already done so. Like I said I have been here for maybe less than a year. I started by jumping in to discussions about masons and vatican and spent a LOT of posts warning people about those two groups. Around the time jidf started copy and pasting that wall of text a couple months ago, was when I stopped ignoring the JQ. I've been jumping into breads doing meme warfare against said jidf people with the majority of my posts since then. I can't ignore the fact that every time I go down one of Q's rabbit holes I find jewish influence everywhere.
I tried everything in the book to DISPROVE the jq thing. I used to be one of those guys that blamed everything on the vatican. Fuck man I've changed my mind on MANY things.
>Fucking spy games man. I'm wore out behind it. Fuck I gotta run…
You and me both brother. This particular thread was a bit of a mindfuck for me (congrats MOS) but having seen this "BV"'s responses, I see no reason to trust him the way I trust BO.
I welcome the showing of my post history, like I said.