BO
t. Voatfag asking about "merger"
If you want to continue here to avert sliding the bread, I'm in to it.
Thanks for your help.
Just know this post has been immensely helpful for myself and others.
I'm glad I could finally catch you.
Please carry on. I'll return with more info should the need arise. For now, I agree with the sentiment that it's not urgent nor all that important.
(1/2)
And maybe I need to spell it out for you:
The group that we're dealing with and have been dealing with at Voat prop up subverses and initiate Divide and Conquer tactics by splitting up free thinkers, including anons.
I know you guys don't care about Voat. I know you genuinely couldn't care less. Here's the thing: anons have long split off and stuck their fingers in many pies to feel their way around in the dark. It's been a long understood development. Anons do this all of the time. Many watch many places and have done so for a long time, just like myself. I've spent a lot of time watching Voat and I was one of the first people to suggest we move the Reddit Replacement to Voat. I know you guys don't care about it. That's why I'm here. Not because someone appointed me, not because we needed someone to fill the role I'm playing, but because it's part of the package I've been able to contribute.
I've been following the Q thing since the beginning, literally the first post. I've spent quite some time on half and full long before, more than usual during this Q thing, and I guarantee I'll spend some time here and there afterwards. Maybe you're not seasoned in these types of chaotic "operations" anons run, so I'll help you out: anons have no assigned roles and they help in whatever ways they can. I figured I could help you guys not because you wanted or needed the help, but because I'd spent a great deal of time at both places. I've relayed plenty of info back and forth this whole time and I've been pushing the people in question to take emotional bait since long before the idea of Voat was brought up here because I was quickly able to see how they operate. Respect that or don't; it won't bother me either way.
But you having the audacity to call me a kike despite all of the persistent work I've been doing is rather alarming to me. You're letting them get to you. You're making a mistake here. Again, say the word and I'll uncloak for you so you know I'm who I say I am.
I never brought anything about this up with BO for a damn good reason. Why? The guy told me flat out that he didn't care. Good. He shouldn't. That's why I'm here, though. I care about perception and the dynamic of the group. That's why I told BO about my concerns with the site owner, PuttItOut bringing in a new partner. I was worried how the potential of Voat being pushed further and further to a honeypot would reflect on us. My reason for this is because the site owner has spoken about "bringing in a new partner", which has already been accomplished. The catch, though, is that the guy won't reveal anything about the person, so we can't vet them in any way. Again, for all we know, we could be sending loads of people to a honeypot. I had no idea BO was being harassed by Srayzie.
(2/2)
Anyway, now that that's all out of the way: are you really so fucking stupid that you'd fall for their framing this as a "beef" between groups on Voat? Of course it's not a "beef" between groups. I know NONE of the anons they're comparing me to. I've spoken with them, sure, but only because we messaged each other saying, "why are they targeting us in groups? this doesn't make sense. anyone have any ideas?" That's all the more we've spoken… and, yes, these guys are anons. I've confirmed that by catching their posts here in the research thread so that we could be familiar with each other's involvement in anon and in Q.
That's how they've framed it from the beginning. They want to put regular anons against the moderators at the board. That's plain to see. These guys are shills. They've run operations to frame certain "goats" (the userbase at Voat) in a certain light so they can anchor negative emotions to the given user's name. From there, they deploy this archaic tactic that you're seeing unravel where they call dissident users by the same name or insist they're an alternate account. They're anchoring emotions and ideas to usernames so they can trigger those anchors by insisting another user is an alternate account. It's a form of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Why do they do this? Because they fucking use alts. They use Discord to coordinate these things. They project continuously.
Now that we've covered all of that, let me explain what I get out of doing all of this: NOTHING. I'm not here to do this so you like me. You have no idea who I am. I'm not NeonRevolt, like they claim. I demonstrated this to you by provoking them so you could see what I mean. Did you not catch on? You don't have any idea what name to call me, but now I'm a namefag? You have no reason to believe I'm trying to divide anyone. Just like you have no reason to trust these people. Why don't you have any reason to trust them? Because Q insisted BO make QRV. Q did not, however, direct us to the sub that is in question, which has long been very clearly compromised.
I would have dropped this if you didn't attack me. I was bringing that link to your attention so you could see how they operate. I'm trying to fucking help you here. If you don't want it and I'm just annoying you, just tell me. I won't be upset. But don't fucking accuse me of "having a beef" like a child or being a kike. I'm trying to subvert no one with this. My only intention was to root out the faggot infiltrators. I too care little about Voat, but I have experience there. My only role in this was to use that experience to steer anons and normies clear of the faggots trying to spoil the bunch. How you think that makes me a kike is beyond me.
so have you guys figured out that all of these faggots obsessing over "jews" and "mujhjoos" and all of their constant and obnoxious involvement in this are merely Palestinian shills?
like, you guys know how many Muslim lobbyists are occupying our government, right?
these shill groups (very likely funded by the same lobbyists/fanatics in question) are using the american people as a battle ground. america was for sale for some time. these groups would battle of control over us through us.
when Q says they want us divided, you should learn how to be specific with this message. we, as american people, are all being used as tools to fight these battles and we need to realize it and abandon all of those foreign entities that have their hands in our government.
so, the people you guys are sitting here arguing with are of no importance.they shouldn't be entertained. they want us divided to pit us against each other. we need to stay focused
Ahh, very true.
It certainly isn't all of them and my saying that was certainly incorrect.
I should have been more specific and suggested that a large percentage is more reasonable.
>There are many evil persons and institutions which do wrong to many people and nations. It can be proven that one of those institutions is Jewish Zionism. We're here to expose cabalists and stop their destruction wherever the evidence points us. No group is exempted.
Well said, by the way.
Better than Google.