Anonymous ID: 3e65e9 July 8, 2022, 8:58 a.m. No.16681343   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16553740

On QAGG - what does this mean? —

" For those wondering about the ID pulled for the TOR posts - take the bread link "8kun.top/qresearch/res/16552541.html" - change the .html to .json - find the message ID used for the drop - look at the data presented. We did notice that between the time we pulled drop 4954 and now that the ID listed in the json file did change. "

>>16553824 - I checked - If we are supposed to see a o Delta for any of q's new drops then I don't see the Trump correllation.

Anonymous ID: 3e65e9 July 8, 2022, 8:59 a.m. No.16681570   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16423322

7/7

NED, Solidarity Center, AFL-CIO, CIPE, NDI, IRI, FTUI, ACLIS, Our Tax Dollars and Extra Constitutional Activities?

 

Here are previous related posts that Anon feels are important to keep in mind.

All PB

>>16412366 Ron Watkins, Jim Watkins talks about a 6 hour interrogation

Jim says Congress is claiming Executive and Judicial Power

 

>>16412790 Jim Watkins Letter to the January 6 Committee

"The glaring facts show that the people’s house is overstepping its position in our American government. Approaching and in all reality by a projection of power the place of not only legislative butjudicialandexecutiveas well. You do have this power. You do not have the right to this power. History will not be kind, you can be certain of that."

 

>>16392612 Former Trump Aide Peter Navarro speaks to reporters at EXPLOSIVE Press Conference after being arrested by the FBI over 2 indictments oncontempt of congress charges.

^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Wonder when they'll do Eric Holder?

 

>>16392427

"Navarro: My mission here is to get this to the Supreme Court…the biggest issue here is whether an incumbent president can strip a predecessor of Executive Privilege. If that happens, if the courts allow it to stand, the Justice Department gets away with that, that will

essentially kill the institution of Executive Privilege as we know it.

^ ^ ^ ^ ^

In Anon's opinion Congress has been usurping (through NED and its affiliates) the responsibilities of the executive Branch for decades. Now, if Navarro is right, the Executive Office itself is at risk. Now the question may be, is that OK with the Supreme Court?