>>16694149 lb
>>16694151 lb
>>16694144 lb
directly contradicts the Q post on 6/24
since that's my post in your cap, i will just say:
no one really goes on hivemind but the entire world, including aggregators and TS influencers, think that the "Q" that posted here is real
therefore, it's more likely that Trump was referring to/contradicting the first Q post here, and not to the larp on hivemind that postednew Qand EtheFriend nonsense
>>16694426
explain thenew Qand EtheFriend posts
why the fuck would Q post that? have you lost your damn mind?
what a sad response, anon. you'll accept any kind of garbage to justify your own conclusion. i think it's much more likely Trump was speaking to the majority of people regarding the 6/24 post, than to the very tiny minority of people who believe in the EtheFriend Q on your board. see
hivemind has 2% of the activity of qresearch. logic is really important..
i'm actually underweight, kek but nice ad hominem?
i agree, Trump was contradicting the larp that posted on this board.
i don't agree that Trump was verifying the larp that posted on your board.
Q has not posted since 12/8/2020.
if so, then Trump's comment tonight meant nothing, so i don't know why you're taking it as direct confirmation. carry on.. my point remains. Q has not posted since 12/8/2020.
it's an unpopular opinion, i know. but all of you are retards and don't know how to perform syntactical analysis.
it's ok, anon
anon, what made Q, Q? was it simply the zero deltas? (which btw, happened at multiple points throughout one day, not one on one night, one a week later, etc. – almost at random, indicating it wasn't intentional. they happened deliberately to the point that there was no doubt, including a Trump reference to something that Q said, not unrelated Trump posts.)
but back to my original question: what made Q, Q?
>original intel
>pics from AF1
>foreknowledge of legal proceedings
>foreknowledge of news events
>foreknowledge of FF
>insight into world leaders' conversations with POTUS
etc etc etc
ALL OF THOSE THINGS MADE Q, Q.
the zero deltas CONFIRMED Q.
they didn't establish Q's veracity, trustworthiness, or legitimacy.
have any of the Q posts since 12/8/2020 provided any of the above information? have any of the Q posts since 12/8/2020 provided any information that any other anon couldn't provide?
look directly the content of the Q posts. one board is hung up on tripcodes, the other board is hung up on zero deltas.
is anyone looking at the actual content of the posts? which are rife with syntactical anomalies indicating these posters are the not the same as the Q we all knew?
confirmation bias can lead you into 50 different rabbit holes, never arriving at truth. that's why Q pointed us to Occam's Razor. apply it to everything you read. what is the simplest explanation? if you need to jump through 50 mental hoops to try to explain something to confirm your own bias or predetermined conclusion, you're not thinking clearly.
when Q said there's no such thing as coincidences, that doesn't mean Q/Trump are in charge of every single coincidence/detail under the sun
there are no coincidences, because there's a higher power guiding all events, higher than Trump and Q. something you noticed could be speaking directly to you and still NOT be coming from POTUS/Q. it might be a message to you or a message to someone else, but that doesn't mean the message is necessarily exactly what you think it is.
of course, my eyes are on. but my eyes also see the things that invalidate the zero deltas. likenew Qand a reference to EtheFriend….
you have to pay attention to all the data points, not just the ones that support your argument. those posts invalidate the legitimacy of whoever is posting as Q there, in my eyes. that has never happened before in almost 4 years. the simplest explanation is that it's a larp. and this isn't even getting into the syntactical shit, or the technical tripcode shit.
Q did 3 zero deltas in one day in 2019. i'm not impressed with your EtheFriend larp Q.
not mad, bro. i'm not as emotionally invested as you seem to be.. i can wait for the real Q to return.
it wasn't a rally, it was a speech. it was also on a serious topic: crime, murder, rapes, human trafficking etc. and finally, it came the day after the shinzo abe assassination news. his somber tone was appropriate for the time and place.
oh sorry anon, i guess i misread your post. i was just pointing out that his rally tone is different from his speech tone. you're right about him being 2 and a half hours late though, i wonder what happened.. maybe the reason he was late is also a reason for his somber tone..