>>16709965

Not arguing just making the point.

Isn't it funny that the same government that is protecting the pedophiles made it illegal to be in possession of evidence of child pornography?

[They] want to be able to arrest and punish anyone who has evidence that will incriminate [them] but never arrest the actual criminals.

Nice little trick, isn't it.

[They] want it to be impossible to prove what [they] have done.

So if you download this stuff you will be charged, but not the people who produced it.

Be careful how you handle this if you do.

>>16710129

I didn't even look.

Just a friendly reminder to anons that entrapment is a real thing.

And when [they] are protecting [their] own, you can't count on a fair trial or a real judge.

Be careful what you go looking at and downloading.

The choice is yours.