Z ID: ac15b3 July 25, 2022, 12:41 p.m. No.16809489   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>WATCH THE WATER

 

 

Swimmer suffers 'significant' injuries in shark attack at California beach

 

The person was taken to an area hospital.

ByTeddy Grant

June 22, 2022, 3:41 PM

 

A person was attacked by a shark at a California beach Wednesday, sustaining "significant" injuries from the bite, Pacific Grove police said.

 

Following the shark attack at Lovers Point Beach, the swimmer was transported to Natividad Hospital, the Pacific Grove Police Department said. The man's condition is unknown at this time.

How to stay safe from shark attacks this summer

 

Police said people at the beach reported that a shark was in the water around the time of the attack. Several people went into the water to help the person who was attacked, police said.

 

"We want to express our gratitude and appreciation to the Good Samaritans that took immediate action and personal risk to assist the swimmer," Pacfic Grove police said. "We thank our partners at the U.S. Coast Guard and the Department of Fish and Wildlife. In addition, we thank our CERT [Community Emergency Response Team] members who responded to help with the beach closures to keep the community safe."

 

https://abcnews.go.com/US/swimmer-suffers-significant-injury-shark-attack-california-beach/story?id=85570005

 

 

 

Lightning

Published June 23, 2022 8:48am EDT

Lightning strike in California kills woman, her two dogs

Pico Rivera, California woman, her two puppies found dead near San Gabriel River

By Stephen Sorace | Fox News

 

A Southern California woman and her two dogs were killed by a lightning strike Wednesday morning as thunderstorms hammered the region, authorities said.

 

Antonia Mendoza Chavez, 52, was identified as the woman killed in the fatal lightning strike around 8:50 a.m. near the San Gabriel River in Pico Rivera, said Los Angeles County sheriff's Sgt. Jonathan Branham.

 

"It was a female Hispanic adult who had been struck by lightning and did not survive her injuries," he said. "She was walking two dogs and the dogs were also deceased."

 

Gloria Colocho, who rented Mendoza a room in Pico Rivera, told FOX11 Los Angeles that the 52-year-old was "hardworking" and had a deep love for puppies, Chubby and Luna.

 

SCIENTISTS THINK 2020 LOCKDOWNS MAY HAVE CAUSED LESS LIGHTNING

 

Mendoza, who worked as a housekeeper at a nearby motel, walked her dogs once a day on the trail near the river, according to Colocho. When the landlord first heard that a lightning strike killed a woman and her two dogs, she said that she immediately thought of Mendoza and her "heart dropped."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-woman-dogs-lightning-strike

 

 

https://www.casino.org/features/shark-attack-odds/

Z ID: ac15b3 July 25, 2022, 12:42 p.m. No.16809544   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16523404

>>16523456

>so Jane Roe said she was raped and so she couldn't be forced to deliver the baby, how did this turn into a woman's right to abort her baby for any reason at all?

 

Roe v Wade was about challenging Texas' abortion law. It had nothing to do with "Jane Roe" it had to do with if denial of a woman's ability to have an abortion by the state of Texas was illegal. Two lawyers, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, wanted to challenge the law because, it was something to do, muh women's rights, or it was Tuesday. Who knows, only they know their true motivations for wanting to challenge the law.

 

Anywho, they started looking around for a pregnant woman because they needed someone pregnant to challenge the law. They couldn't just challenge it without having a supposed person who was wanting an abortion. They ended up finding pregnant waitress "Jane Roe" and were like, "Hey, Can you say you want an abortion, so we can make a case?" Roe was like, "sure, if you got five bucks, I'll do anything."

 

So off they went, claiming this woman, who already had two kids, wanted an abortion and the District Attorney of Dallas, Henry Wade, was preventing her from doing it. But the case wasn't about the individuals, per see, but about whether the District Attorney had the right to deny abortions at all. So that's how it became for all women, because it was the ability to deny abortion that was on trial, not Roe's particular abortion, which she never got by the way.