SOROS / DAVOS/ 2018 / SOLVED

In Soros' speech yesterday, he constantly referred to the "Trump administration" - here are quotes:

"Clearly, I consider the Trump administration a danger to the world, but I regard it as a purely temporary phenomenon that will disappear in 2020 or even sooner," Soros said. "I give President Trump credit for motivating his core supporters brilliantly — but for every core supporter, he has created a greater number of core opponents who are equally strongly motivated. That is why I expect a Democratic landslide in 2018."

businessinsider.com/george-soros-davos-speech-trump-north-korea-nuclear-war-2018-1

Davos 2016 was held January 20-23 2016

weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2016

Not only was Trump not president then, he wasn't even the GOP nominee. The Republican National Convention where he was nominated was held in Cleveland, July 18-21, 2016

Now, can we fucking move on?

>>167597

Anon, please see above >>167574

>>167638

>Fuck off Soros shills, filtered.

What a cognitive dissonance having retarded fucking dipshit. I was one of the first early yesterday during Soros' speech to point out the exact same tie as 2016. I was completely sold on the idea that yesterday's speech was a replay of 2016. I decided to research it to verify, and I found the clearcut, unquestioning evidence that it was not, as posted here. >>167574

If Soros mentiones the "Trump administration" in his speech yesterday, and Davos 2016 was held before Trump WAS EVEN FUCKING NOMINATED BY THE FUCKING GOP - how the eternal fuck am I a shill for pointing it out?

Are we interested in truth or propagating lies? Why is it so important to not have Soros at Davos yesterday? Hell is coming for him - he won't escape it. Q never said Soros was already in custody. He only said a "special place" is picked out for him.

Don't be a fucking idiot.

>>167721

Yesterday, Soros kept talking about the "Trump administration" over and over again. He said "President Trump" over and over again. Davos 2016 was held in January 2016, before he was president, or even the GOP nominee. In January 2016, some of us were actually supporting Cruz, before we really fell in love with Trump.

This isn't difficult. Soros was there yesterday, in the exact same tie. Otherwise, how/why would he say "President Trump" and the "Trump administration" in January of 2016? If somebody can offer a good explanation of that, I'd love to hear it.

>>167756

I'm not a goddamn Soros shill. I'm asking for anyone to explain why Soros would keep talking about how "President Trump is a threat", and mention the "Trump administration" by name in 2016, as he did over and over again in yesterday's speech. Remember what Q said - "She was never supposed to lose". If any leftard progressive socialist icon dared mentioned the words "President Trump" prior to November 8, 2016, they would have been lambasted by the left.

Just explain, and I will gladly listen.

>>167815

Trump was not president elect in January 2016 during Davos 2016! He wasn't even the nominee! Jesus people. I am not a fucking shill. I've been here with you guys since November firmly in the Q camp. I was red pilling people about the evil of Soros when most of you were still shitting the bed.

>>167782

Ok, that's a theory worth discussing. You don't have to call me a fucking goddamn shill because I am questioning this. If the working theory is that Soros speech yesterday was filmed a few months ago, fine. That's a legitimate theory. I can't counter that, and have no desire to. You may be right. I was simply addressing the theory that his speech yesterday was the speech he gave at Davos 2016. Because it wasn't.

I will fully entertain the idea that it was previously filmed back in late 2017. That's actually a very good theory.

Now quit calling me a fucking Soros shill.

We as anons should be only of one accord on one thing, and one thing only. Our devotion to POTUS.

Other than that, debate and discussion is healthy. It is the socialists and leftards that demand collectivism, and a hivemind incapable of individual pursuit and intellectual exploration.

For us to become like them means we've lost our very soul.