>>167331

So have other anons discovered what I was saying yesterday - Soros speech at Davos yesterday was from 2016? Boy, I caught nothing but shit for that.

>>167604

Have the other anons found the photos of Soros at the Bussels Economic conference with the same jacket/shirt/tie as Jan. 2016 yet? They're there…

>>167645

Or Jun. 2017 in Brussels.

Regarding Soros - my point here is not to say that Soros definitely wasn't at Davos. My point is that there's enough evidence that it is in within the capability of those in power (on both sides) to have staged his presence at Davos. My point is we don't know and I believe what I've pointed out substantiates that we don't know.

>>167686

Thank you, anon. My point stands. So e'rebody else eat a dick.

>>167688

>>167633

Please explain.

>>167719

Also June 2017.

>>167633

>>167755

>>167633

Please explain.

>>167778

Correct me if you're wrong, but are you using the mainstream media as evidence that George Soros spoke at Davos? Really? At this moment in time?

>>167799

>>167633

Note the date. 2017. Brussels. All video appears to have been scrubbed.

>>167815

>>167671

>>167815

>>167633

(Sorry about previous mis-post. I got the wrong reference.)

>>167826

(Ignore this - I got the wrong reference.)

>>167837

>>167633

Please explain the date.

>>167855

>Most people associate NWO and globalism with the 1970's idea of everyone holding hands and loving each other.

Not sure if I agree with that. I remember "new world order" as a negative concept from that time. They tried to push it that way but I'm not sure it had much traction.

>>167859

Not ironic. But we're dealing with the most powerful factions in the world. There is evidence from MSM that Soros had exactly the same outfit on in June 2017 - something they wouldn't try to fake at the time because there would be no motive at that time (more credible.) Now, there are very good reasons on both sides to fake Sorors' presence at Davos and yet…he's not on the list of speakers. Also, does anyone really think that if Soros was gonna speak at Davos, he'd be in a small, shitty room with a small audience as in the video they put forward? I think not. Also, that video does not match ANY other video I've been able to find of people speaking at Davos 2018.

>>167867

Where is the first photo from? Is it claimed to be the same day at Davos 2018? (Because it isn't the same tie.)

Also → >>167633

>>167875

That's Davos in Jan. 2017, not Brussels Economic Forum in June 2017.

>>167879

Looks like a MUCH smaller conference in Brussels, doens't it? Maybe June of 2017? How come this doesn't look like anything else at Davos? Maybe it isn't actually Davos, people. Nothing Soros says can be tied precisely to NOW.

>>167905

Where's the video from the June 2017 Brussels Economic Forum? They all seem to be missing.

It is obvious this isn't Jan. 2017. It is not clear that it is Jan. 2018. It is very possible it is June 2017 in Brussels.

>>167921

Imagine for a moment that you're George Soros and you're going to give a talk including press and questions. At Davos. So…it happens in a back room with a completely different motif as everything else at Davos and you're not on the list of speakers.

Male Bovine Excrement. Total bullshit.

and I ain't no faggot, faggot

>>167923

It is pretty clear that it wasn't Davos 2017. That was in January. My contention is that it was Brussels in June 2017. I was totally unable to find any video of this talk.

>>167942

Yeah, ignore Davos 2017 - that was in January. That was NOT it. I contend the video was from June 2017 and I cannot find ANY videos of it. But I found this photograph from the media in July 2017: >>167633

>>167978

Exactly. No other evidence to tie Soros to Davos 2018 other than this video is being advanced as evidence. I'm not buying it. See my previous posted website snap from Jul. 2017 in Brussels.

>>167977

Ok, well this shows that at least one talk in Brussels is not the same event. There's still more evidence, though. He's not on the speaker list and the motif of the room is completely different than everything else at Davos 2018.

>>167979

The only reason I'm pointing it out is it could be evidence of extremely large shifts in power. IF this is faked, then someone faked it. Why? Do you not agree that would be a remarkable event which could lead to other findings?

>>168007

Something about lots of flak when over a target…

>>168046

>WHAT TARGET? Fucking neck yourself.

Meh. My evidence has been delivered. In the absence of more compelling evidence, I'll leave all of you to contemplate your navels.

And now, EGGS.