>I THINK both Hunter and Ashley knew this and tried to derail the candidacy.
Mysterious NSA-associated online entity 'Q' writes 'We have it all', and 'Dark to Light', and posts:
The flood is coming.
Emails, videos, audio, pics, etc.
FBI accidentally deletes texts?
No Such Agency accidently releases IT ALL>
Shall we play a game?
Q
Yet people can't see the forest for the trees. Hunter and Ashley are cover stories. We have it all.
She's a brilliant agent that has even you wondering, Anon. Her role is complex. She was featured in the media and made popular beyond what is normal for an otherwise obscure minor congressional representative. Like Crenshaw that makes agents easy to spot. (There must be a reason why this person is on TV so frequently while hundreds of other representatives are ignored by the media.) She exposed bad policy to ridicule with her 'cow farts' 'accidental' post of a policy draft. Yet, she has a following and influence with a certain demographic which may be useful in guiding them away from the 4-6% who will be lost.
>stepping in the trap.
"What advantages might exist when you know the other sides playbook?"
Did 'Mueller' open the door to Ukraine?
Did 'Mueller' open the door to FISA [illegal]?
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did 'Impeachment' provide a platform to discuss findings of Ukraine?
How do you introduce evidence legally?
Did 'Impeachment' harm or help POTUS [public]?
How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?
Why didn't POTUS remove [Hussein] holdovers from NSC?
Do you really believe that POTUS & team trusted [Hussein] holdovers to remain within the admin and work to enact POTUS' agenda w/o bias or confrontation?
How do you 'awaken' the 'induced coma' public [FAKE NEWS control] from their long sleep?
Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack…….
Logical thinking.
Q
3850
Feb 10, 2020 12:58:12 PM EST
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
>How convenient that that part of the discussion is always ignored.
It's much better when the courts limit their focus to analyzing legal matters. A judicial decision must be based on established law. Anyone who wishes judges to consider matters unrelated to law must first see those matters established as law. It is entirely appropriate for the court to ignore issues like personal responsibility and privacy when deciding matters of legal precedent, especially in constitutional cases. Roe was decided on the 'penumbra' (shadow) of the Constitution which was perceived only by those in favor of abortion and who maintained that the Constitution implied an
otherwise un-enunciated right to privacy.
>“Wild Weasels”