>>16738359

Yes, Hitler made concordance with the Catholic church. He was Christian (at the very least nominally), and he ruled a Christian nation.

By working with the church he would be much better placed to do good things for his people.

In Germany at the time, there were many clergy working against the interests of ethnic Germans (think modern equivalents supporting open borders, ordaining women, preaching anti-racism, supporting homosexuals & communists etc).

He dealt with the subversive aspects of religious groups & clergy undermining the people, and worked well with those that were not.

This is exactly what a good and honourable man would do. And what the population wanted him to do, and would want a leader to do.

Again, there is no "there, there".

It would be like seeing a man open a door for a girl on a date, and then trying to prosecute him as an evil misogynist. That evidence does not support it, and even if one were to take the absolute most uncharitable reading of it, it still would in no way make the case.

Clergy and sects, yes even Christian sects, in alignment with Jews & Communists against the people found themselves dissolved and their hold on the people loosened.

Clergy and religious groups earnestly working for the benefit of the German people, were treated differently.

The power of bad religious figures to harm the people was removed.

Again, this is exactly what you would want.

And unlike the Jewish led Communists, Germany kept its churches and its faith.

The bad had to go, the good & benign could remain.

His whole approach to Germany in a nutshell.

Same for religions, religious figures, individuals, races etc.

What sane man would want agents of harm to stay in his community and continue to harm his people? Only goyim nations ruled by Jews operate in such a way.

>>16738483

Oh, wow, Hitler spoke honestly about how the German people saw their faith and religion…

That must be evidence of….? What that is bad exactly?

And if you want to say that was the whole of his views, and that he didn't see that the goodness of his people also had another source… their blood and history as Aryans.. you'd by lying.

But these things need not be in opposition.

For the sake of argument lets say:

1. Hitler saw that the church provided a good moral foundation for people.

2. Believed in God.

3. Believed Christ was the son of God.

4. Believed Aryans were created by God.

5. Believed Aryans to be a naturally Godly and moral people

6. Also believed that MEN could twist churches, religions and culture to harm the German people, and spit on God's true wishes, such that Christian churches could do good or bad, depending on how the MEN INSIDE THEM chose to interpret God's will, and how they taught it

There you have a sane and reasonable foundation for a) recognising the actual harm that was done by some under religious cover to the German people, b) recognise the good that could be done for the German people by religion and c) outline a way to deal with religion and the people…

…that which harms Germans, bad, against God's will, not true Christianity, to be dealt with and combatted.

..that which aids the German people, good, in alignment with God's will, true Christianity, to be supported.

Again this is rational, reasonable and exactly what a sane person would want.

Aryan's, being God's creation, God would rather see prosper and not be harmed, so long as they were acting in a moral way. Exactly what he chose to promote and have Germans act as.

Pornography banned, child prostitution banned, usury banned etc.

This is how ridiculous the positions against Hitler are, they only work if the assumption is made first, that he is evil incarnate. That way the sanity and reasonableness of the most obvious view (he was none of those things) can be overlooked.

>>16738578

Hitler was supported by upwards of 98% of the German people, and was easily the most loved and supported leader well above any Western politician at the time or since.

He also expanded the freedom of ethnic Germans, who controlled their own businesses and labour to the same degree as Germany's western counterparts.

The standard of living provided by the Germans for themselves, during the period, was above the standard of living Western nations provided their citizens.

The freedom that was removed was the freedom to be a traitor, and go unpunished for treason, which is what has caused the downfall of the West, and the freedom for Jews and foreign parasites to control how the nation is ran, and prey on the people.

Ethnic Germans in Germany, were far more in control of their own nation and government under Hitler, than any Westerner can claim of their own people, in their own nations, at any time over the last 100+ years.

Jewish media rules the West, and has done for a century plus, not the people.

And also note, Hitler was operating under full knowledge that war was coming.

When the West went to visible war footing (that is, where awareness was spread that they were to be making war on Germany, and it went beyond closed doors), freedom was restricted in the West at least to the same degree as Germany.

Except unlike in Germany, that restriction of freedom was used to make the people serve FOREIGN interests, where Germans continued to serve their own.

>>16738651

And he rebelled against the other Jews, because they were evil.

Additionally, he as not a PHARISEE.

There were many jewish sects at the time, not all were evil, the Pharisees were, being the upholders of Babylonian satanism.

After Jesus many Jews became Christians, and the other Jewish sects FOLDED INTO PHARISEEISM.

Modern Judaism is Phariseeism. ie Talmudism. i.e. Babylonian Satanism.

Jews of Jesus' time were not all Pharisees. Jesus was not a Pharisee. MODERN JEWS though, the people we refer to as Jews today, ARE Pharisees and in that tradition.

Ergo, saying Jesus is a Jew is misleading.

It has a surface truth, but applying the word as it is today, to the period, is designed to create a false impression. What we refer to as a Jew today, in modern context, was not what Jesus was.

Jesus was not a Jew, as today's Jews are, as he was/is not in the mould or tradition of the Pharisees.

He fought them in fact and was diametrically opposed to them.

>>16738652

Indeed. He knew nothing would stop the Jewish ruled Communists from coming, but very likely believed Anglo Whites would have enough sense to see the truth, and not follow (through to the end ) Jewish propaganda.

And until we could see it for ourselves (how difficult it is for Anglo Whites to free themselves from Jewish lies), how could even we ourselves think otherwise?

ww2 and its aftermath are absolute testament to the power of media, and the damage foreign parasites can do to a people when granted control of their media for a generation (or more).

But even if he could have foreseen Western Whites would not break the semitic hold that was upon them, it is hard to see any avenue for a different set of outcomes or actions.

Like for Assad, Saddam, Gaddafi etc, the deal when dealing with Jewish power was and remains: submit and sellout your people to their great harm, or have endless war thrust upon you.

Terms an honourable and decent person can never submit to.

>>16738811

Yes, we can see looking back that every word of German "propaganda" was truthfully spoken and written.

They had no need to lie or embellish the truth, like the Allied side, as the truth actually was on their side!

And we can do the same with every modern war during our lifetimes to establish a pattern.

The western media and governments (both in the hands of Jews) continually lie about the parties they want to attack, to enable them to be destroyed, and to cover up their own crimes.

Vietnam, Iraq war 1, Iraq war 2, 9/11 Afghanistan, Syria etc.

A proven CONSISTENT record of telling the same type of lies, to allow and absolve their own crimes (and graft).

If true EVERY SINGLE TIME post ww2, why not true of ww2 as well? We can check the historical record and evidence and see it is so!

>>16738945

Your theory falls down for one basic reason.

The people follow where the media lead.

The media leads the people to White genocide.

The media covers for Jews.

If the Jews are not scapegoats to be jettisoned, they could get on the news and say so. They could expose the real culprits.

BUT THEY DON'T.

And on the contrary, Jews little, small and big are on the record as saying they 100% support White genocide, and support call its vectors like mass immigration and anti-racism.

They also have a verified history of supporting White genocide and the dispossession of Whites & Christians in their own nations..

Gates of Toledo.

Gates of Constantinople.

Hart-Celler Immigration Act.

And the fucking Talmud Jew.

It has been published for centuries.

Jewish involvement is not made up. There is a consistent and unbroken history of it. VERIFIABLE. And observable every day one observes Jews.

Jews also DIRECTLY BENEFIT from the project they cover for.

While the other agents you allege are responsible do not.

It is the Jews. And you are a Jew running cover for Jews. And no one, absolutely no one buys your shit dude.

Your actions here just add more VISIBLE evidence of how Jews are involved in running cover for Jews and their programs.

YES, other institutions and peoples can be corrupted. But "its the Jews" does not mean "lets let everyone else get away with it".

It means the Jews AND other responsible parties will ALL be dealt with.

Which doesn't change it being the jews dude.

Gates of Constantinople.

Gates of Toledo.

Hart-Celler Act.

>>16739053

>Defending unity is not defending any one 'group' over another.

It is when it requires a people to be unified with the agents (races/people) delivering & benefitting from the racial replacement & disenfranchisement of their own group, and by requiring unity with them precludes their being able to take action against the agents, or the project itself.

There can be unity between races: unity on White nations staying White, and Whites being in control of White nations, and Blacks in charge of Black nations etc.

Unity WITHIN White nations, where White nations are to be free for everyone to compete to represent themselves in government and media etc, i.e. where White nations are to be for everyone, is unity around WHITE GENOCIDE.

And anyone asking for that, themselves is a genocidal anti-White racist. Either out of extreme ignorance of the reality of their situation and orientation, or because they support it.

Disallowing White nationalism in White nations, and seeking Whites go in a different direction, is just as racist and genocidal as it would be to go to China to get the Chinese to unify with Blacks around making China a mixed Negro nation.

What kind of idiot and evil person would seek to make the Chinese unify around such an approach?

A person with ZERO regard for the rights and interests and welfare and wellbeing of the Chinese.

It is racist. It is genocidal. It is unacceptable.

Fuck unity around White genocide. Racial unity around White nationalism (and nationalism and self-rule for each race in its home) is where racial unity should be. The only fair, balanced and reasonable setting for unity.

>>16739060

All these selected posts do is make the case that Jews should have no place in White &/or Christian societies.

And yes, I fully agree with that.

Jews are not the only problem. But their willingness and desire to work with goyim traitors against the folk of each nation, to further the culture and religion inherent in their Talmud, is the very reason to push them back to lands of their own, and pass laws to exclude them from any position of importance and power within other nations.