what do these even do???
can they zap anything?
i just don't get it, like it's all mental. at least with being gay it's an uncontrollable body reaction
>My argument does not rest on mental differences between the races. You keep wishing to take it there, presumably because you have no argument against what is required BIOLOGICALLY for a group to continue in sustainable form. The fact that one set of life forms may (or may not) think like another, does not remove the negative consequence for another group, of their ceasing to biologically exist. The fact that Grey and Red squirrels likely think very much the same, does not stop animal conservationists from seeing value in saving the Red from loss of habitat, resources and life at the hands of the introduced Grey. So I tend to care about life. All of it. I care that its various forms are not thrown under the bus unnecessarily. I apply that to people who are in my ANCESTRY group, and who VIA THEIR CONTINUED EXISTENCE, can continue my own family line in a manner that is best placed to replicate its qualities and phenotype. That is, to have it sustainably continue. Alignment with life Anon, not death, not suicide. Why the need to continually take the conversation to places that seek to downplay that, or chart a different course? Why not just accept the right to life and self-determination for Whites? Why is that so bad you feel you need to get Whites away from that path? And do you know what that makes you? What would it make you if you were trying to do that to Blacks, or all people but Whites? I mean, to you, if there is no loss in Whites losing their rights, why any loss in all but Whites losing their rights? You fancy that you are fancy in argument, but in matters of down to earth signficance anon, that is not what marks a person as the kind other people would appreciate or want to listen to. You can continue to think you send yourself aloft with your words, when you really pull yourself down, and your argument and position in front of others, but this is no matter to me. As I stated and I stated truthfully. My position is only to stand and say Whites should only accept a unity that protects their needs as an DIFFERENTIATED people. I will simply repeat this because that position holds no matter what arguments you raise. My need is not to argue you to acceptance, just to stand next to your argument another that says, this is probably more rational, fairer, and more balanced and just than accepting your own. And others can judge for themselves. And so I will not go any further except this single statement reposed to you: Whites must only accept unity with others, in a form that allows White nations to stay White and under SUSTAINABLE White control, anything else is a genocidal position and involves acceptance of genocide and harm against Whites, and so invalid. But as Whites can accept other races having the same rights in their spaces, there should be no trouble in FAIR MINDED people of all races accepting the above. Indeed they would have to be genocidally anti-White to oppose it. Argue till you are blue in the face to stop Whites accepting the truth in that. All you are doing is showing your despicable and genocidal lack of appreciation of the rights of others. Exposing yourself, not holes in an argument.
ftfy formatting
my niece just failed 4th grade
bananas though
works like a charm, it's how i got my husband Junsook
you have to understand it's a texture preference
I don't understand how it's more viral than the last lol
those look like insects
is seinfeld anti-semitic?