Anonymous ID: 24eed1 July 16, 2022, 11:46 a.m. No.16745853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5873 >>5962

Thinking about the Left-tard contingencies for the failed and descending Biden residency.

 

  1. I've read there is something about the length of time the current resident is in office being important in terms of how 'fulfillment' is defined or considered. If "person 1" completes at least 2 years or <2 years. They want Biden to last 2 years - Jan 2021-2023 because it would allow the replacement to be able to hold office for two (2) additional four (4) year terms. If Biden exited before (2) years/ Jan 2023 - the term would 'count' as a full term for the replacement and they could only stand for one (1) additional term.

 

That said, which could be inaccurate, what are they going to try to do?

 

  1. Biden can possibly last until the coming January 2023. He cannot last a full four years thru Jan 2025.

  2. So let's say that after Jan 2023 the wish to replace him.

a) VP moves up, they nominate a replacement VP. [likely only a 2 year fix - then run their desired package in 2024].

b) Handlers nominate someone else. Newsom? Could Obama be nominated for (P)? If not could they install Newsom or other as (P) with Obama as (VP)?

 

What other people are plausible as replacement VP if KH moves up? Newsom, Obama, Moochelle, AOC…?

 

If KH not moved up to (P) what other people are plausible as replacement P and VP? Assume she would bail f not moved up.

Anonymous ID: 24eed1 July 16, 2022, 11:57 a.m. No.16745908   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Why did Banks Soar Friday when some are cutting profit statements by 50% to cover coming expenses and loses?

 

https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article