Anonymous ID: e29b54 July 16, 2022, 4:56 p.m. No.16747218   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7261 >>7427

While they are Grooming your kids into trannies, they are indoctrinating them with CRT and studying them without their knowledge to figure out how to get better at grooming and indoctrinating.

 

> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11121-021-01291-y

 

ublished: 06 September 2021

 

Q Chat Space: Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of an Internet-Based Support Program for LGBTQ Youth

 

Jessica N. Fish, Natasha D. Williams, Lauren B. McInroy, Megan S. Paceley, Rachel N. Edsall, Jackson Devadas, Sara Birnel Henderson & Deborah S. Levine

 

Prevention Science volume 23, pages 130–141 (2022)Cite this article

 

2336 Accesses

 

36 Altmetric

 

Metrics details

 

Abstract

 

There are few psychosocial support programs specifically designed to meet the unique developmental and health needs of LGBTQ youth. Even when available, many youth face significant barriers to accessing LGBTQ-specific services for fear of being “outed” to parents, peers, and community members. The current study assessed the utility, feasibility, and acceptability of a synchronous, adult-facilitated, chat-based Internet community support program for LGBTQ youth aged 13–19. Chat transcripts were analyzed to examine how LGBTQ youth used the chat-based platform to connect with peers and trusted adults. A separate user satisfaction survey was collected to assess the personal (e.g., sexual orientation, gender identity, age) and contextual (e.g., geography, family environment) characteristics of youth engaging in the platform, their preferred topics of discussion, and their satisfaction with the program focus and facilitators. Qualitative data analysis demonstrated the degree to which LGBTQ youth were comfortable disclosing difficult and challenging situations with family, friends, and in their community and in seeking support from peers and facilitators online. Youth also used the platform to explore facets of sexual and gender identity/expression and self-acceptance. Overall, users were very satisfied with the platform, and participants accurately reflect the program’s desired populations for engagement (e.g., LGBTQ youth of color, LGBTQ youth in the South). Together, findings support the feasibility and acceptability of synchronous, adult-facilitated, chat-based Internet programs to connect and support LGBTQ youth, which encourage future research and innovation in service delivery.

 

3. Intersectionality

  1. David_he (Youth): I just thought it was interesting because usually when we talk about intersectionality, we talk about how multiple minority identities can negatively impact someone. But intersectionality is also the fact that privilegewhite privilege, male privilege, being able bodied, passing, etc.) can create an advantage that can positively impact their lives, even as a minority

  2. David_he (Youth): Because even when there are gay people in the media, they are usually not people of color…or at least that’s been my experience. Trans men in the media seem to be 99% white trans men. Some people don’t realize how the fact that they are privileged in some ways but not in others can still intersect in a way that puts them at a higher advantage than others

 

> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11121-021-01291-y/tables/1

 

PB below

>>16746313

>>16746574

>>16746581

>>16746332

>>16746375

>>16746381

>>16746384

>>16746397

>>16746438

>>16746572

>>16746793

>>16746805

Anonymous ID: e29b54 July 16, 2022, 5:03 p.m. No.16747261   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7427

>>16747218

>>16747218

Author: declares "no competing interest"

also Author: founder of the groomer chat application

 

Deborah S Levine

 

Deborah S. Levine, MSW, MAT, is thefounder of Q Chat Spaceand Director of YouthLink at CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers.

 

Jessica N. Fish, Natasha D. Williams, Lauren B. McInroy, Megan S. Paceley, Rachel N. Edsall, Jackson Devadas, Sara Birnel Henderson & Deborah S.Levine

 

Prevention Science volume 23, pages 130–141 (2022)Cite this article

 

2336 Accesses

 

36 Altmetric

 

Metrics

 

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

 

Both studies referenced in this report were approved by the University of Maryland Institutional Review board in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

 

Informed consent was obtained from individual participants included in the Q Chat Satisfaction survey data collection.Chat transcripts were__ not__ originally conducted for the purposes of research and therefore __did not obtain informed consent __from participants;transcripts were designated as de-identified secondary data sources.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

The authors declare no competing interests.