"Its the Jews" means, we will get out the Jews and every entity with a history of working with them, and their cabal, against the people.

It does not mean, the Jews will be exiled and other globalists will stay.

It means THE LOT go.

Jews, Jesuits, globalists, communists, & Islamists follow ideologies that are fundamentally opposed to the health and freedom of Western civilisation & White people.

They were allowed a foothold because Whites felt impervious, and so free to allow their enemies to make their homes amongst us while making cause against us.

As we begin to realise we are not impervious and unassailable (who could doubt that having seen the damage done), the spirit returns to cast out those who by their nature and orientation, ideology, and sheer biology, don't offer us anything, but can only act against our interests.

Whites do not owe Jews anything.

We have no obligation to treat you as one of us.

No obligation to you at all, at any level.

We have nothing we want from you.

And nothing to gain from having you in our societies.

So we have no reason to keep you in them, or ALLOW you to remain.

Our societies are FOR US, just as a Chinese society exists for the Chinese, and not to be a launchpad for the dreams, interests, prosperity & plans of people who are not Chinese, so too for our societies.

We were convinced to allow something different for a time, but the space was used to work towards our dispossession & genocide.

So NO MORE.

The animal kingdom knows the score, if you want to stick around you become a symbiote, not a parasite.

>>16749994

No fag, the board is about the truth.

Any board that decides at the outset to put certain truths off limits, is not dedicated to the truth at all, BUT MANAGING IT.

>>16750052

Judaism is Satanism. Read the Talmud.

A "new covenant" was necessary for a reason.

>>16750062

Your speciality I believe.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/travel/2016/03/17/welcome-tel-aviv-gayest-city-earth/y9V15VazXhtSjXVSo9gT9K/story.html

>>16750068

These kind of incidents make it categorical.

The purpose of a nation is to provide a home for a specific racial-ethnic group.

Without a return to this, the (effectively) non-nation, is just a pot for people to draw from, use and abuse, suck dry and destroy. With its inhabitants defenceless (without a national barrier) against their mistreatment.

Letting people that have a natural interest to work against your own (because they are of different race, culture &/or religion), in your biolabs, military, government, media, financial system, legal system etc is the dumbest thing a people could ever do.

It is bringing the enemy's sword to your own throat and inviting it be used.

>>16750029

add letting them play with your food system..

>>16750087

I am a syncretist personally, and believe that the Christian church should reform away from the things you mention.

If it were up to me the cross would replaced by the Algiz, a symbol for life, and any hint of natalism and death worship turned on its head.

Even whilst a Christian (as I was raised) I believed Christ should be taken off the cross, and worshipped for his life, with a symbol of life, not one of death.

A healthy religion, to my mind, must be about life. But I do not get in the way of Christians and their faith. It is for them to choose.

Mainstream Christianity was there during healthy times in our civilisation, so I think there are ways for it to be compatible. Certainly the modern church, as expressed through its liberalist tendencies is horrific for White people and the future of the earth.

>>16750093

>Poor muhjoo shill is having a bad day trying to push his hate and division.

There is no hate or division I push Jew.

Just that each people have space where they are not exposed to the plans and impacts of those that care not what happens in their future, or are actively arranged against it.

Hence nation states for each people (racial-ethnic group).

That is the oppose of hate for others, but a kindness to all. That can work in EVERYONE's interest, not everyone but one group, that comes from unity around anti-racism in White spaces, which NECESSITATES and delivers as an outcome Whites losing their spaces.

For civil war in Yugoslavia first DIFFERENT people had to be pushed into the same place.

If war was to be disallowed, then the higher breeding group (Muslims) would have taken the whole land from the less rapidly breeding group (Christians) over time.

So there is the "peace" & "unity" of anti-racism.

Peaceful (except for the mass rapes and assaults and murders, that go with it).. genocide & dispossession.

Between a breeding war to survive & retain self-determination (that delivers the death of the planet), or war to the last man, a healthy & happy compromise.

EACH TO HAVE HIS SPACE.

Note, you stand against that compromise though.

So YOUR chosen path, the one that works for a group to be harmed.

How GLOBALIST of you. Not one hair of a difference between the path you ask for, and the path they ask the population to tread.

>>16750263

So you are saying it is the flag the globalist side fought under to subjugate people that were exercising nothing more than their right to self-rule and go their own way?

Because that is what your post said, and the reality of what went on in the civil war.

A war to contain, entrap and force… of one people DISTANT to the others, OVER the others.

A repeat of the English vs American colonialists, but this time with the Yankees standing in for the English against people who just wished to be free of them.

>>16750314

>The "God" of the Christian Bible commands babies to be killed.

New Testament speaks for Christians, Talmud for the Jews, the Quran for Muslims.

Effectively the Old Testament has no real influence on any group (perhaps some "Torah" Jews.. very few). It exists as a "Christian" text only in the loosest sense, a matter of temporary practicality & propaganda, not reality.. (marketing of a new religion is better if it can be connected to an older tradition). There was a NEW Covenant for a reason.

>>16750326

>There is no direct reference in the Hebrew Bible to an intentional termination of pregnancy.

What about the Talmud?

>>16750363

>there is no reference to INTENTIONAL killing of fetuses anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.

Just in the Talmud, the holy book of the Jews.

>>16750380

> as justification for slavery, sacrifice & murder.

Have not seen any Christians do that, let alone 2 billion of them. Could you point out who they are and where they do so?

Modern example, not centuries old.

>>16750382

The Talmud is the holiest book of the Jews, and the foundation for modern Judaism as a culture and religion.

At the time of Jesus many different Jewish sects existed, along with the Pharisees.

Over time, Jews folded themselves into these two movements and the others were lost (the Essenes etc).

The Pharisees are the people that practiced Babylonian Talmudism.

Which forms the basis of modern Judaism. Modern Jews are Pharisees. Modern Judaism is Talmudism.

>>16750433

>So you agree intentional killing of fetuses is nowhere in the Hebrew Bible, the holy scripture of Judaism?

No as previously stated, it is in the Jewish holy book the Talmud, the PRIMARY SOURCE of Jewish law and theology.

>>16750441

>13th Amendment provision for slavery

You referenced 2b people. 2b people are not covered by the 13th amendment.

As for the other matters I do not agree or disagree. Influences are varied, and there are different threads running through the origins of the modern Western legal system.

I will firmly agree with you though that in practice they operate as Jewish/satanic temples, and would need drastic reform to be otherwise.

Emphasis on letters of law & interpretations of it, to deliver whatever way they can be twisted, a Judaic form of in-justice, alien to the nature of Aryan people, who believe it is justice that counts (crime & outcome arising), not what one can deliver via cleverness or lack of it.

Where there is weakness in a thing, and the conditions it was built for no longer operate, there will be the exploitation of a thing.

Our legal system as is, if it was in the hands of Aryans, would perform much better than it does now, in the hands of non-Aryans (& brainwashed Aryans), but a better system over all would be great.

>>16750447

"believe me"

>>16750479

For me the salient point begins with "does it work"?

The current justice system doesn't, so regardless of cause it needs a reformat.. and the reformat should start clean sheet, and not necessarily involve elements that were once counted as important.

I can see the behaviours of modern justices and the system definitely aligning with what you say. If I hold back in committing more it is because I don't have a lot of background digging into the origins of our legal system (hey Law 101 was a long time ago).

As I understand it though there could be thought some similarities to the ancient Greeks, and other European sources, so other threads in there beyond Judaic. So I take it on notice. I don't need to think any stronger that both need reform in any case! (the Jews position in society plus the operation of the legal system).

>>16750584

This is why every politician that sat in parliament and never put forward a bill or voted on one that disallowed mass migration & settlement of racial aliens is guilty of treason.

And so too every person who voted for such parties & politicians, and corporates, and NGO's who supported them, or who made a case that mass immigration of racial aliens should be allowed or sustained.