>>1676367 (lb)
¬Q was here 06/06 already about same time, an anon pointed out the symbol is math for "not". comms were similar in nature.
It's about learning/testing the comms, as they say (possibly because we have the clock now). Not saying anyone should spend their time on it, but if Q & ¬Q both refer to the same Q-clock ans sytem of reading/working it, then it couldn't harm looking into what has been posted. There may be something to learn about the qclock irrespective of who posted the crumb.