>>16765915

>>16765958

Replying to one's own post without the (me) next to the post number being replied to as a continuaton or clarification is largely taken to be a sign of shillage and often schizophrenia.

<Why did the plan include followers embarrassing themselves?

In what way? Datefagging or believing Rea Raw News was credible would indeed by embarassing. When I first came to these boards use of discernment was strongly encouraged.

<Why did the plan include followers destroying their reputations?

Again, datefagging involved? As far as reputations destroyed, reputation in the eyes of whom?

<Why did the plan include followers losing their jobs?

How do you know the plan involved that? I saw examples of the cancel culture sheeple lashing out as their MSM promoted comforatable lies were threatened

<Why did the plan include followers losing their 1st amendment?

It may dawn on the liberals that have been crowing over twitter shadowbans and such that the Mid-terms may place others in positions of power to censor lefties

<Why hasn’t Q ever apologized?

Apologize for what? "The choice to know will be Yours"

Those that wish to lurk are welcome to lurk. Those that wish to depart are wished Godspeed.

>>16766115

<Q explicitly told anons to spread drops far and wide.

In which drop was that?

<I could give you dozens.

By all means proceed. I took the "use discernment" to include being choosy about with whom I shared anything from these boards. As for your example, were the 2018 mid-terms specified? Were the 2022 mid-terms alluded to instead? Was there anything else to go with that statement? Future proves past I hear around here.