way to deflect! change the subject entirely and twist some tangentially unrelated factoid into a smear against the hero.
now that's some top shelf shill faggotry right there! give these bois a shekel, and a new set of kneepads.
way to deflect! change the subject entirely and twist some tangentially unrelated factoid into a smear against the hero.
now that's some top shelf shill faggotry right there! give these bois a shekel, and a new set of kneepads.
>Pakistan has nukes. This is not good bros..
the taliban seizes nukes from pakistan, uses them to obliterate israel. the world is cleansed of zionists, and talibidan takes the fall.
sorry… i missed the part that is not good.
>A new command I give you: Love one another.
'zat include "tough love?" aksin' for a fren….
>What would the charge be?
incitement to riot
sedition
treason
dozens of other lesser charges could/would be piled on…
>Harry Potter Actress Claims Arnold Schwarzenegger 'Deliberately Farted' In Her Face
actress claims to be psychic. can mystically divine intent on part of others. 'cause SHE never farted at an unseemly moment.
>Our role is to assist entropy.
tard with kindergarden understanding of thermo speaking out of turn again.
maybe you should read a book on non-equilibrium thermodynamics sometime. then get back to us.
believing in the "big poof theory" (as i'm sure all pseudo-literate tards do),
how do you 'splain the current state of the universe, if it began in a state of perfectly uniform disorder?
the fundamental driving force of nature is NOT entropy, but the tendancy toward self-assembly and ever increasing complexity…
ORDER OUT OF CHAOS (read it, dumbass).
P = Pindar
the Philthy Rich
the 13 Phamilies
these people have no ideology except POWER, and they wield power thru wealth
TAX THE RICH OUT OF EXISTENCE
that's NOT socialism, it's common sense.
let gates and bezos and buffet et al try to buy congress on $7.25/hr
>Violation of the first amendment. Unconstitutional. They're directly attacking the Constitution in broad daylight.
>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…"
that argument FAILS on the face of it. all "they" have to do is claim "their" religion embraces faggotry. then their "rights" are equally protected.
LOGIC MUCH?