>>16767084 A different perspective on Schiff's amendment - FTA:
The information which this amendment specifies cannot be used is information gathered by our military that “violates” posse comitatus. I’ll talk about the “violates” aspect of this later but the interesting tidbit here is that because the information being referred to is such that relates to posse comitatus, it means that it would be information gathered from military operations here within the United States.
Why would Schiff bother putting this forth at all?
Think about it logically. How do the democrats and Schiff operate? The policies and agendas they put forth like this are typically in reaction to something. There is a school shooting so they put forth a gun control bill. They get caught stealing an election through the use of geotracking, so they take action to crack down on people selling geo tracking data.
Cause and effect.
'''The “effect” in this situation is Adam Schiff’s amendment trying to prohibit the use of information gathered through “violations” of domestic military operations as evidence in any form of proceedings.
The “cause” can only be that there is some form of domestic military operation gathering intelligence in the first place.
So using our deductive, although speculative, reasoning we have concluded that there may be a domestic military operation taking place. Can we deduce who is behind it?'''
If the military was going to operate domestically, somebody would have to give the order for them to do so, and an order like this would have to come from the very top. So let’s look at the chain of command:
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/schiffs-amendment