> i could have said it's the filthy rich, and we can solve the problem by taxing them out of existence.
Won't work.
They make their own money.
>That's exactly what I wrote, then self edited. He gets what he gets for being a merc. That's a death penalty in Russia.
>Bye Alex, sorry not sorry - Slava Ukranie idiot..
This is QUITE LITERALLY the same attitude as that expressed by urban elites in the US who think that Trump supporters are stupid rural scum who deserve death.
Actual Nazism is an abhorent ideology that devalues individual life just as communism does.
But in actual life people embrace symbolism for all sorts of reasons.
NONE merit the death penalty.
(Even though 99% of tatoos are an aesthetic travesty…)
Many "anons" are dumbshit groupthinkers who hope to be eaten last.
>Absolute bullshit. I am a "Nazi". i.e. a Hitlerian National Socialist.
It's my lucky day…omfg.
First off…
Nazis and Communists are basically the same.
Both judge your value as an individual via your membership in some abstract group.
They only differ on the naming of the group.
Nazis focus on "race" while Commies focus on "social class".
Don't get me wrong… both race and social class are somewhat real…
But they do NOT determine your worth as an individual.
The points my "Nazi" interlocuter makes do not refute this.
OF COURSE free will allows total degeneracy.
THIS HAS NEVER BEEN IN DOUBT.
It is just a metaphysical fact.
This doesn't meant that the LAW should allow total degeneracy.
It absolutely should not.
Actions that irreperably infringe on the rights of others should be legally forbidden.
And a reasonable nation standing up for itself can restrict business dealings with nationals of countries ruled by total degenerates, like China.
You don't need a "fascist" ideology to embrace such limits.
NOBODY in China is free, so abstract ideologies favoring "free trade" are simply irrelevant.
This "Nazi" seems to confuse loyalty to the state with basic morality.
THESE ARE NOT THE SAME.
Obviously the STATE can often go astray.
This doesn't meant that patriotism is bad in principle.
But morality and patriotism are not the same.
The true patriot will often reject the state that currently exists, on the grounds that it is morally debased.