Dr. Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. In recent years, Dr. Seneff has focused her research interests back towards biology. She is concentrating mainly on the relationship between nutrition and health.

We are still trying to establish the long-term effects of Covid injections, Armstrong begins his podcast (above). The long-term effects are the subject of Armstrong’s highlights from a previous interview with Dr Seneff where she explained what happens when synthetic mRNA goes into the human lymphatic system and settles in various organs – the mRNA “teaches” local cells to produce spike proteins that become targets of autoimmune attacks. She warned that given viral mRNA can convert into DNA and disrupt cells’ normal repair and replication, it’s possible you could have an altered human genome – altered by mRNA injections to make a spike protein – which could be passed down to future generations that could become a permanent feature in their DNA.

Long-term, the lipid nanoparticles (“LNP”) seem to be damaging to our body’s organs, Armstrong said. If someone has only had one dose of the injections, hopefully, the dose of LNPs that was injected is in small enough amounts to not cause damage or possibly that particular dose was from a placebo batch. However, the more doses someone has received, the more spike protein and the more LNPs injected, the worse it’s going to be.

Dr. Seneff and Greg Nigh wrote a paper which was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research (“IJVTPR”) in May 2021. Dr. Seneff is convinced, even more so now than when the paper was written, that these so-called “vaccines” are dangerous. At the time of writing their paper, Dr. Seneff and Nigh were predicting things they had never seen before:

“We predicted that the vaccines would drive the emergence of variants that would be resistant to the vaccine and that’s exactly what is happening. We predicted that vaccinated people would get lots and lots of symptoms that would be across a broad range of possibilities – you wouldn’t think an injection into the muscle of the arm could cause so much collateral damage throughout the body … we predicted neurological disease, in particular, and autoimmune disease.”

“As far as your immune system is concerned, there is something coming into the muscle that’s extremely toxic” and the immune system doesn’t understand what it is, Dr. Seneff said, “it’s a stealth entry of a virus into the muscle … the vaccine contains the sequence, the messenger RNA sequence, that codes for the spike protein. The spike protein is the most toxic part of the virus.”

The spike protein in the injections has been genetically modified to “humanise” the RNA so that the body won’t recognise “the cell has been hit” and the immune system won’t “shut down that cell” to stop it from making spike protein. As a consequence, the body’s cells manufacture the injection-induced spike proteins even faster than if they had been infected with a virus. “They’ve engineered it … to make it make the spike protein even faster than the virus makes it … a cell stuck with this RNA can’t do anything but keep making spike protein. It’s making massive amounts and it makes it very, very sick,” Dr. Seneff said.

So, if you get this virus naturally, Armstrong explained, your body won’t make the spike protein that makes you sick as the immune system will shut the cell down. “It would have been better for you to just catch Covid-19 than get the vaccine … and you wouldn’t have LNPs and mRNA messing with your cells.”

After the cells have produced the spike proteins on their surface as instructed by the mRNA injection, the immune cells then attack the cells’ spike proteins and take up the mRNA as well. The immune cells then start to manufacture spike proteins and “they’re completely out of control at this point,” said Dr. Seneff. The immune cells then go into the lymph system and then into the spleen and several organs including the liver and ovaries. The immune cells are carrying this toxic mRNA into the lymph system and organs. Everywhere they go they cause inflammation and DNA damage, a “real mass destruction is what I would say,” she said.

As Armstrong explained, inflammation is a result of the immune system attacking the spike protein and trying to kill it. “And so, if your cells are producing it and it’s in [whichever organ] it will become inflamed. [For example,] your liver will become inflamed.” This is what’s causing the “brand new hepatitis that’s never been seen before until after the vaccine.”

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/21/how-the-vaccine-affects-the-body/

Car and Driver found in its hilarious review of the new, electric Mazda MX-30. And that’s not some old EV that should be resigned to the scrap heap at this point…it’s the 2022 model of the car.

As background, the MX-30 is designed to be an EV for the average American worker that has to commute to his or her place of work. According to Mazda, it’s meant for a daily commute of about 30 miles in typical city/suburb terrain (so no big inclines) and with opportunities for charging it up at each end of the daily commute.

So it might be fine for commuting to work if your workplace isn’t all that far away, but, as Car and Driver found, it’s wholly unsuitable for anything else, as the car was running low on battery after a miserable 70 miles.

es, really. According to the review, despite having an EPA range estimate of 100 miles between charges, it only went a very unimpressive 70 miles in a 75-mile-per-hour road test.

The review might have put the car’s failure to go more than a negligible distance in even harsher terms, saying:

The argument can be made that the average owner doesn’t need more than 100 miles of range, but we aren’t going to make it. It’s 2022—we’re seeing 500 miles from electric cars, and 200 miles should be expected. The MX-30 offers an EPA-estimated 100 miles of total range; we made it only 70 miles in our 75-mph highway test. Even worse, the MX-30’s 76 MPGe for those 70 miles of highway driving is less efficient than far more powerful EVs. The Model S Plaid got 91 MPGe in the same highway test, for example. Recharging at a Level 3 charger, it can get 80 percent topped up in 36 minutes; this takes 2 hours, 50 minutes at a Level 2. Our ride from home to the test-drive site and back wouldn’t have been a possible round trip in the MX-30. Mazda does offer 10 days of no-cost loans of other vehicles from its fleet for the first three years of ownership, but who wants to swap cars any time you want to leave your neighborhood?

“Wouldn’t have been possible” isn’t really what you want to hear in a review, particularly when regarding the very reasonable idea that the car should be able to make it to a test facility and back without too much trouble.

But, of course, it’s what the review found because the new EV just isn’t that capable; the laws of physics can’t be ignored, so the ~$35,000 car can only make it the equivalent of my truck, a 2013 F-150, with four gallons of gas (about 80 miles).

That’s not only embarrassing, but it shows the problem with electric cars: they can’t go very far and, even if they might have a huge battery pack that drags them somewhere to the range of a typical car (~500 miles), it takes hours to charge them up.

Oh, and whereas Tesla’s at least have the redeeming feature of being fun to drive because they accelerate like a rocket ship, the Mazda can’t even do that, as the review noted, saying:

Mazda’s EV is currently only available with a single motor making 143 horsepower and 200 lb-ft of torque. It’s zippy enough around town, but on the highway, or even some of the wider, meaner streets of Los Angeles County, you won’t be passing any Teslas—or even Chevy Bolts. At the test track, it took a lazy 8.7 seconds to get the MX-30 up to 60 mph. The CX-30 does it in 7.6 seconds, while other similarly sized electric SUVs such as the single-motor ID.4 and the Hyundai Kona Electric do it in 7.6 and 6.3 seconds, respectively. It’s even worse at freeway speeds: Accelerating from 50 to 70 mph takes 5.3 seconds, which feels like an eternity on an onramp. Top speed is a mere 91 mph. This sluggishness is somewhat expected given the MX-30’s $34,695 starting price, which is slightly more than a Chevy Bolt EUV’s yet less than what it takes to unlock the ID.4 and Kona. Our well-equipped example cost $38,600. We tend to accept a certain lethargy in small gas engines in return for fuel economy or a low buy-in price, but electric motors need to make up for their lack of fun noises with fun acceleration. The drivetrain in the MX-30 feels detuned, maybe to stretch the range of its small 32.0-kWh battery pack, which leads us to our next performance demerit.

https://trendingpolitics.com/ev-test-ends-in-failure-after-just-70-miles-wiley/

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a37843011/2022-mazda-mx-30-ev-drive/

>>16780982

>>16781072

they are the ones posting all of the moojoo shit here

to think our taxpayer dollars are paying them to do this

>>16781109

you just jealous stephanie

you never be as beautiful and intelligent as melania

you are, and will always be, a disgusting skank ho