>>16782201 (lb)
On this board, it is we the anons.
IRL, unfortunately, the judiciary has now stepped in.
A damned good pummelling to death by an angry mob has become somewhat frowned upon lately.
Without wishing to cast aspersions on your motive, isn't that what the filter button is for?
I think I speak for many when I say that censorship is abhorrent and anathema to anons in general.
Sure, but is this something new?
Ebot has been here who long now?
But who gets to be the arbiter of what is and what isn't spam?
Who is the one to draw the arbitrary line in the sand?
Is hivemind spam?
In my less than humble opinion, of fucking course it is, but would I delete it?
Fuck no!
Would I call it out for the crap that it is?
Well, fuck yeah; been there, done that shit more than once.
One knows thine enemy by their actions and inactions.
If all trace of their actions is sucked into a vacuum of nonexistence, do we thus strengthen their hand whilst equally weakening our own?
>they're gonna keep doing it too because they're too low IQ to fuckin get it anon
Do we have nothing to learn from the frequency of spam shit or the actuall words posted?
Deletion keeps us all safe, amirite?
Kekking in 5 minute breads.
>everything has meaning
And thus this anon is vehemently anti deletion.
When new BO took over and instigated a mass deletion pogrom, quite similar to the OSS reign of terror, anon sought answers and expressed dissent on the meta thread at the deletion policy.
Although the deletions diminished initially, BO never once deigned to responds to my criticism or questions.
It seems the deletion policy is now back in full force without gauging anons' opinion first hand.
This one anon vociferously reiterates that censorship in any shape or form is anathema to the anon ethos!
>So post the actual article instead of clickbait.
Kek, newsbot gonna clickbait and faggot bakers gonna notable; where ya been the past 3 years?
>by having POTUS say either "boom", "boomerang" or both
Why, tornigger?
There is no need when a progression of previously unpublished AF1 interior shots from the same set will suffice.
What a damned fucking coincidence!
every fucking time I call the admin out on their faggotry, I get this response -pic rel. Every fucking time.
And this is not the first time, nor the 10th time, anon has made this comment.
>So you are anti deleting child porn?
Oh yeah!
Strawman or what?
Do I have to literally state I am anti deletion of legal posts before you faggots open your front hole?
How about you close it? Your breath smells like fish!
Here is an example of spam, but do I call for this crap to be deleted?
No!
The faggot is an obvious shill with an anti Trump agenda, but I have the power of filter finger at my disposable.
Unfortunately, this pole smoking homo uses a rotating IP so it is less than effective.
Should we delete this spam shit as well?
>That's almost all deletions that happened today,
What the fuck are smoking'. crackman?
Ebot is CP?
Why are you so vociferously defending post deletion?
> But you don't mention that, do you.
How about because I didn't know, pillow biting knob jockey?
But I still don't support deleting that pole smoking shill faggots' posts any more than I support deleting any other legal post here.
> I am sick of that dudes shitty memes over and over and over.
I wholly concur. I wish the fucker would be taken down by exploding enemas clandestinely inserted while that faggot was sleeping, but I still will not endorse deleting even one legal post.
>Reproductive rights are human rights
Why do they call infanticide reproductive rights?
Because language is used to discombobulate the masses.
Insert George Carlin average IQ video here
Hi rotating IP Ron shill pillow biter.
A collection of recently altered online dictionary definitions ranging the gamut from gender to vaccine, including the before and after, would be an awesome red pill.
Anon is kicking anon's self for not having thought of this sooner.
>So wait, you pretend to know that all sorts of bad deletions took place,
You are a devious cock smoking homo with an obvious ulterior agenda and a well lubed anus.
I said nothing of the sort.
I was responding to the BV post in this bread saying all ebot spam has been deleted.
>Well its a fine line to walk.
A fine line that is impossible to define without offending one side or the other.
As such, a solid stance of censorship or no censorship must be strictly adhered to by the one at the rudder.
Don't call it a free speech board if free and legal speech will be deleted.
If Karens object, let them.
>"instigated a mass deletion pogrom"
Fuck, trying to maintain a coherent and logical discussion with you is tiresome.
Read the fucking context, anal dilator.
That was referring to the initial actions once the new BO wrested control from that other massive faggot, OSS.
This conversation is now over. Good day, sir.